Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (1)

gyang79 (0) 04-16-12  07:03am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)


Every model looks exactly the same and if thats not bad enough they pose exactly the same as well. I wish the women could look a bit more lively as opposed to the blank stares on their faces as if they were manequins. I should have subscribed to FTV girls instead.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (7)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


otoh (54) Met Art seems to be a very divisive site! You can't argue with the amount of material or the beauty of the models but I have to agree with you. It's not so much the level of explicitness; just that in most cases they just don't have much in the way of seductiveness or tease.

FTV is on my list; I could also recommend Breath Takers or Petites Parisiennes if you want to stick to fairly soft material but with a bit more personality; or if you want a bit more but still glam and well-produced, perhaps Digital Desire?

04-16-12  09:26am

Reply To Message


Ergo Proxy (21) Your comment has some flaws:

1. East european models are the most beautiful women there are and they don't look the same, maybe look closer.
2. The human body has only a limited number of poses. What do you expect? If you apply this criterion the galleries would turn into boring after the 3rd set or so.
3. Blank stares??? Maybe you joined the wrong site.
4. MetArt has the most diversified shooting locations one can think of.

I admit that the newer sets are all glamour and polished, not like the old sets from 2002-200x but they are still worthwile. It sounds like a rant here but I think you are just pissed that you joined and did not get what you wanted but from their previews it should have been pretty clear to you what to expect. I am just puzzled from your reaction.

04-16-12  03:11pm

Reply To Message


gyang79 (Suspended) REPLY TO #2 - Ergo Proxy :

East European models are the most beautiful, in your own opinion. If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you. Half the women on that site do not look happy to be there. It doesnt have to be hardcore for me to like it just a bit more lively. The women of FTV appear more lively, healthy, and def holds my interest over MET-ART. I thought id give them a try based on the great reviews but im utterly disappointed.
04-18-12  03:47am

Reply To Message


Ergo Proxy (21) REPLY TO #3 - gyang79 :

I get it that everyone has his own views of beauty, but by all fair means finding the women of Metart that repugnant? And where comes the following from?

"If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you"

In what possible way on holy mother's earth are the models there "nearly starved to death"? I was making an "effort" here and dug out my MetArt folder and skimmed through a bunch of galleries and couldn't find a single model which can be suspected of bulimia. Anyway I don't want to argue that much anymore.
But I really want to know, did you subscribe to FTV and are you satisfied there? Just curious.

04-18-12  07:53am

Reply To Message


gyang79 (Suspended) REPLY TO #4 - Ergo Proxy :

Yes I've subscribed to FTV girls before. Great site and gorgeous women. I highly recommend it!
04-18-12  10:19am

Reply To Message


tangub (155) REPLY TO #5 - gyang79 :

Have to agree they have many gorgeous models at FTV but i've never been convinced its that great a site for those of us who prefer photo content compared to a site like Met Art.
04-19-12  12:29am

Reply To Message


gyang79 (Suspended) REPLY TO #2 - Ergo Proxy :

Well I must say you have a valid argument. I have discovered the advanced search feature, cant believe I havent found it before. Def some gorgeous models on here. Navigation for this site is a bit tricky.
04-20-12  09:28pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.