Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Naughty America

Naughty America (2)

MiztaBlu (28) 03-24-12  06:23am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Top notch content
-Hottest women in the industry
-Nice variety of girls TO AN EXTENT (See cons)
-Good lighting and camera work for the most part
-Great download speeds
-HD videos and standard both look really good
-Nice location variance
-13 Updates a week
-HUGE collection
-Staff very receptive to suggestions
-Fully Downloadable content
-No daily download limit (at least I dont think)
Cons: -HD videos arent as good as other sites, but not bad
-While they offer a better variety of hot girls than Brazzers and BangBros, they still dont seem to use enough ethic girls. Mainly all white chicks
-Site ideas are basically all the same, but not a big deal.
-SOMETIMES scenes randomly disappear, but its pretty rare
-Older videos, aside for some remastered scenes, look pretty rough by todays standard.
-May be too soft for some
Bottom Line: Overall, in my opinion, NA is the best of the big 4 networks (NA, Brazzers, BangBros and RK) at this point in time (March 2012). Obviously, opinions vary, but I love what they are doing right now. I am not into the super hardcore stuff, so this stuff is right up my alley. A few years ago I was really on the fence about them and thought they were heading downhill, but they really upped the production value and dont hire uggos or grandmothers anymore. All the girls they hire are either very in demand or hot up and cummers.

I seen the previous review before this one, and I have to comment on it briefly. Yes, this site wont appeal much to those who are into the super hardcore stuff, but IMO, its silly to judge a site for something it doesnt try to be. NA is like the Playboy of hardcore porn. Its fairly straight forward and regular, but thats what it sets out to be. The preview area of the site doesnt suggest in anyway that its anything other than that, so I cant see how people can complain that its not hard enough. Thats like walking into Kentucky Fried Chicken and getting pissed because they wont serve you a hamburger.

NA is great for what it is. If you are into harder stuff, there are many other sites that will appeal to your tastes better. But it does annoy me when people complain about a site not doing something it never claims it does. It would be one thing if they promised "extreme hardcore porn", but they dont.

Beyond that, the only real complaints I have is that it doesnt offer more ethnic women. No, they dont promise that either, but when it comes to girls, its a bit different. Even their Latin site hardly gets updated anymore.

Bottom line: If you are into basic, straight forward hardcore porn that isnt over the top, but offers high quality content regularly and consistent updates, this site is absolutely for you. But if you love the real raunchy hardcore (regular DPs, gaping, etc...), do not join...and if you do, well, go order a hamburger at KFC.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Gazette Risque (55) Great review!

Could you tell us if they may have started with the live shows again?
After they cut that off I canceled my subscription.

I heard they did some tests with new live shows at some point but I wonder if they're back for good now.

03-25-12  08:30am

Reply To Message


MiztaBlu (28) REPLY TO #1 - Gazette Risque :

No...Live shows are no longer part of NA, but you cant really blame them. While alot of people liked the Live shows, there wasnt quite enough interest and thus incoming revenue to keep it going. The cost to do those Live shows isnt cheap so they had to cut their losses.

I personally dont care for Live shows, but I know alot of people like them. Doubt they come back to NA though.

03-25-12  08:47am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) Good review, MiztaBlu even though I canceled after one month because of the "enhanced breasts" factor. I think they even must have Brazzers beat when it comes to fhat. If I were to rate the top four sites, they would be on the bottom because of that factor alone. But great review anyway and I do appreciate the fact that tastes differ.
03-25-12  10:28am

Reply To Message


MiztaBlu (28) REPLY TO #3 - messmer :

Seriously? I guarantee they dont have Brazzers beat on fake tits. The reason I am no longer at Brazzers is because thats all they use. NA does use a good bit, but at least they use girls like Victoria Lawson, India Summers, Lizzy London, etc.... often and not just all big fake tit girls like Brazzer always does outside of their teen site.

And to be fair, most of the girls in the industry have big fake tits, especially the ones based out of Cali, where NA shoots. Bang Bros and RK shoot mostly in Florida I believe, which is why they rack up alot of amateurs that dont have boob jobs.

Anyway, not trying to change your mind...just wanted to bring up a few points. Although I think Btazzers, NA and RK are all quality sites, I think BangBros is awful and has been for years. To each their own, though.

03-25-12  11:43am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - MiztaBlu :

Ah, I think I see where our disagreement comes in. I move mostly in mature circles and at NA as well as Brazzers there was a preponderance of false tits in that niche. As opposed to most I am not particularly interested in young girls. See my age! :-)
03-25-12  12:02pm

Reply To Message


Gazette Risque (55) REPLY TO #2 - MiztaBlu :

Yeah, figured as much. Loved the live shows though.

Thank you for the info, much appreciated!

03-26-12  06:41am

Reply To Message


MiztaBlu (28) REPLY TO #5 - messmer :

Haha...its all good. Everyone has their own tastes. Thats why there are so many niches that cater to everyone.
03-26-12  06:50am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.