Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Oldje

Oldje (0)

selphy (15) 02-05-12  04:13am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Fantastic and Beautiful Girls (nice and young famous pornstars but also semi pro models)
- New videos are in HD 1280 (most of them are not in HD but the format is acceptable, 720x404)
-There are photo and screen cap of the videos
Original and exclusive content that combine romantic sex and a little fetish (old and fat man- with young and beautiful girls)
Cons: -There are about 350 videos but 150 of them are in real media and their quality are poor (about 200x100; I've deleted those files...)
-No model info
-Old files are divided in two or three parts
-The files you downloaded are not named, so you have to renamed them (boring)
-No update info (1 new episode per week)
-Navigation is plan and the login is boring (userid, pwd and captcha).
-The server timeout is too short; it's about 2 hours, and at the and you have to re-log in
-No bonus site (I thought that the other Class3some site was included)
-The are music inside the video and often you can't hear the "voice" of the performers.
Bottom Line: I was intersting in this particular content, most of all because the preview of the site showed a lot of beautiful girls.
So I become a member a couple of weeks ago. But after two days of surfing this site I was not satisfied at all.
I think that if you have such girls who perform and that especially have performed in the past in your site, you have to re-mastered old videos and offer (about 30 euros a month) to your customer a good quality. Not surely the quality of a 15 Mb video in .rm format !!
Otherwise you had to offer one or two quality bonus site !
The same company has also Class3some: it appears a good site (the same girls of Oldje) with only about 50 video.
Why does not offer the two site at the same price ?
Oldje is expensive if you think that 1/3 of its content is not usable, but if the Company offers Class3some togheter with Oldje, I think the 30 euro price is correct.

Well, If you are interersting in old-young sex the new video of Oldje are really good ! But remember that only about 200 video (the new ones) are really usable (not less than 720 x 404)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Fine review, fine update for this rather special site..

But when that's said - I do not agree with the score (no big deal: the score is personal) - but still: this site is certainly one of a kind.

Some of my favorite stash is from this site - and even the material from way back when the vids-quality was close to lousy - and in the terrible Real Media.

Today the content is simply great - but agree with one very significant item:

The site should definitely UPGRADE/reedit the old vids!!!

02-05-12  08:46am

Reply To Message


selphy (15) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Thanks for your comment.
When I rate a site, at the first, I usually observe the price/quality.
In this case the overall quality is low: I think that you have to upgrade ALL the old files you store on your server, otherwise (if you want to sell the content of the site at 30 euro) you have to offer more (bonus site, other Parent sites...).
They have more than 400 videos, but about 150 are not usable.
The content of the site is 85, the vids quality is 45...., the average is about my rate ...:)

02-06-12  12:09pm

Reply To Message


slutty (111) Nice review, and I agree with almost all of your points. At this stage I wonder why they even bother with the RealMedia crap, I thought the same thing when I was a member here.
02-07-12  12:10am

Reply To Message


mbaya (364) Considering about 250 quality videos are on the site, I would have no complaints. That is a lot, when you take into account that this is a niche that is catered to by very few sites. While I have not joined this site, by its reputation and your positive comments, I am sure I would give it a higher score.
02-12-12  09:07am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.