Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Action Matures

Action Matures (0)

Active
75
messmer (137) 01-30-12  02:12pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 268 videos, many in 1280x720p HD 3000 bitrate, wmv format.

Older Videos at 640x480p 2000 bitrate, wmv or avi are not bad considering the advances made in quality over the years.

Many mature ladies, some for every taste, but don't expect glamor.

All contents are hardcore which is a plus for many.
Cons: The typical Ferro minimalism. No search engine, no model base, no scene description.

Lack of co-ordination between the various sites. I just received this one as a bonus and once again had to feed it my awkward generated user name and password. Other sites manage to make navigation between their sites easier, why can't Ferro.

The very strong feeling that the network is on cruise control without anyone at the helm. Last update to this site was in October 2011. It looks as if they have given up and just collect money now for what they have accumulated over the years.

Only one download at a time possible. Attempts to download a second one at the same time will fail.

The same HUGE watermarks as in their other sites. This is especially noticeable in the 640x480p videos with their smaller windows.

No pictures.
Bottom Line: This site might be worth a subscription to you if you like hardcore and reasonably mature women.

The picture quality in most videos is excellent, only spoiled for me by those accursed large watermarks on top and bottom. If you don't mind those then there is enough of what looks to be exclusive material to keep you happy for a while ... especially since one monthly subscription brings four bonus sites with it.

Just be warned that Ferro must be getting ready to leave a sinking ship, judging by the rarity of updates in all sites I have looked at so far, as well as deafening silence when it comes to support.

I won't be back but Ferro might strike a chord with you, so I'll give it a 75. Not great, but tolerable.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

otoh (54) Seems like you're back on the mature sites, messmer :) Thanks for the review - I've not joined any Ferro sites, although I've been tempted since they have a few nylon-themed ones, I think. But now we are used to some very good sites, it seems a bit much to charge a full $30 for such a basic setup...
02-01-12  12:28am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) Thanks for another review of a mature site, messmer....
Guess like you, I still keep hunting for those overwhelming, great, fabulous sites with fine mature (and mature lingerie) content....It ain't easy - not easy to find the ones with productions where you just say: Wow!!!
Joined the Anilos lately, but...??? Too few, really fines ones here...

Like you, I'm still on the hunt...

Maybe our only solution is going back to those vintage deals, but, boy - why can't someone produce those top-mature-lingerie-ect. sites???
A bit sad.

02-01-12  06:56am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) BTW: On the subject my favorite is Janet Mason...and she's still on..
02-01-12  07:14am

Reply To Message

4

messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

Thanks, fellow searcher and sufferer. I agree with you about Anilos.
It could be for different reasons or maybe not, Denner.

I've been tempted to re-subscribe to the site for months but a) I find most of their models too young looking for my taste, and b) they forget to bring lingerie to most of their shoots which makes most updates too dull for me. I simply do not appreciate nudity right from page one. It has to be more gradual for me.

I find this the case with all of the photo sites I've subscribed to lately. People must be collecting models, rather than models plus what they wear. Therefore one set appears the same as those that came before and those who will follow. Same basic three, four pieces of clothing, same poses, same everything ... yawn.

02-01-12  02:08pm

Reply To Message

5

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - otoh :

I would personally steer clear of them, otoh. The set-up is too primitive and the watermarks rob me of any joy in their videos. Still haven't received a reply re. "why couldn't I download the zipped picture sets," so that too counts against Ferro.

Talking about nylon-themed sites. Modern times mess me up here because my heart goes pitter patter when I see "nylons" and then find mainly pantyhose (tights). The definition of nylons must have changed dramatically over the years. Talking about nylon in general I much prefer it to cotton which absolutely turns me off to this day. I got used to shaved but never to cotton, or to thongs for that matter! :-)

02-01-12  02:15pm

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - Denner :

I must have a look for Janet Mason, Denner. Tell the truth, after that initial look at the three Ferro sites I now have access to, I stopped going because I cannot stand their watermarks and their primitive navigation.
02-01-12  02:18pm

Reply To Message

7

Denner (233) REPLY TO #6 - messmer :

About Janet Mason:
Brother in Arms, messmer...lol - seriously: She has done a LOT of fine porn and including lingerie - but/and I'd be bankrupt if I - to day - should go after all her fine material at alas too many sites: Manojob, Brazzers, Naughty America, HDPorn.com, Danni, even Karups and Anilos...and her own site....ect.
But it's - as usual - a matter of a lot of browsing.
Bottom line: She's a very special mature doll/girl/woman..

02-02-12  06:35am

Reply To Message

8

messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - Denner :

Sorry, Denner, I misunderstood your reference to Janet Mason, I thought you were talking about the Ferro sites and looked high and low for her name. I think I'll check Anilos, that would most likely be the quickest way of putting a face to the name. I am sure I must have seen her before if she appeared in all those sites.

Sorry, old pal, old friend. I just came back from a tour of Anilos and now know why I've never heard of Janet: she has enhanced breasts and therefore is a model I would always ignore because of that factor. The rest of her is fine!! :-)

02-02-12  10:45am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.