We Are Hairy Comment : Not sure why it's scored so high

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Comment

A note about the site and any replies from other users.

We Are Hairy (1)

xexbot (36)	01-30-12 10:44am
	TRUST USER? YES (24), NO (0)

Not sure why it's scored so high

I really don't get how this We Are Hairy outscores ATK Hairy. In terms of layout they are about equal navigation/search-wise. Both have massive content, and some of it dates back at least a few years so they both have issues of not everything being HD. Really, when you get right down to it, it all comes down to content. And that's why I don't see why We Are Hairy is scoring higher than ATK.

WAH has some decent models, but even their best is almost average for ATK. My primary complaint about WAH is that it is almost 99% softcore, solo modeling. No action to really speak of. Even the masturbation videos they have are, well, boring.

As far as a hirsute fetish site goes, WAH is okay, they are certainly worth a look if you just want solo models doing little else than posing. However, if you want a littel range in your hairy porn, then I would certainly look at ATK Hairy because they actually have everything from "X" to "XXX."

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (3)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	Capn (28)	Functionality is superior at WAH & the Webmanager is very responsive. ATK is a much bigger outfit & therefore more ponderous in getting improvements implemented. ATKNH have shedloads more content, WAH has only been going a couple of years. Models & content is a very personal thing. Cap'n. :0/	01-30-12 12:32pm Reply To Message
2	RagingBuddhist (59)	I'll second Basil's attentiveness as a factor. As for WAH not running to "XXX", I think you should consider that not all porn is hardcore and that there are fans of the softer side of things. If the site's not your thing, it's just not your thing.	01-30-12 12:44pm Reply To Message
3	messmer (137)	Since reviews cannot be but subjective, here are my reasons for rating WAH higher than ATK: Less emphasis on extreme hairiness (legs, arms, anus, belly etc.), something I dislike heartily, especially hairy legs. ATK has become increasingly more extreme over the years. No hardcore! Many of us prefer softcore solo models. Material is better in quality because they only started a couple of years ago so most is in HD or, the few very earliest updates, in near HD quality. Number of updates approaching those of ATK but of better quality, especially the pictures. Custom zip available. Site makes it easy to browse. Friendly and very responsive webmaster! You on the other hand come at the judgment of the sites from a different angle. Every update containing hardcore always got the lowest marks from me in ATK while you bemoan the fact that WAH does not give you any hardcore. Nothing wrong with your preferences except when it comes to comparing the two sites. Just like apples and oranges, in my opinion. In any case, welcome to Porn Users, xexbot, I don`t think I`ve seen your name before.	01-30-12 12:52pm Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.