Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris (0)

TalonIcefire (6) 01-28-12  02:47am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)

Overated

Although Ron Harris may have spent decades photographing some of the most beautiful women in the world, and has numerous awards and accolades under his belt, he cannot seem to post regular updates to his site. I do not understand all the various high mark reviews from various reviewer sites to include TBP. (Donít get me wrong, I do understand the verbiage for the various porn review sites.) I can only hope Ron Harris Studio will never be the porn site by which all others are judged.
For 29.99, I signed for both Ron Harris Studio and Nubiles on January 09. Since then, neither the update page nor the coming soon page has changed for Ron Harris. I am two-thirds through my membership already! A regular membership price is too lofty for the content available. Finally, someone needs to shut the cameraman up in the videos. Whether soft-core, hard or somewhere in between, beyond interviews, I should never hear the cameraman!

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (6)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Drooler (218) I agree, and I've never understood what all of the fuss about Ron Harris' work is. The photo galleries are Warholesque in their similitude and, as you say, the updating is unreliable. Besides, the photos don't look very natural; those who dislike "shopped" pics probably wouldn't care much for it.

I've been a member 2-3 times, and I've always kind of regretted it. It's not all bad, but it's definitely overrated.

One more thing: That watermark. Awful.

01-28-12  03:08am

Reply To Message

2

TalonIcefire (6) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

I have yet to decide whether to showcase any photos from Ron Harris. I believe he relies more on his previous achievements than his current endeavors. In my study, Iíve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models. Natural behavior is a key element in my taste and for me to display.
Although I am not into huge watermarks, one should at least take pride in your work and seal. The update pages gives you five tabs of model indexing yet does not highlight any changes. My niece has designed better websites than this. Additionally, Iíve looked at his ďsite bonusesĒ but frankly, I do not care to sift through the forgotten garbage.
The only way Iíll ever join again is if itís offered in a two for one package deal with a site I trust and respect such as Met Art or Femjoy.

01-28-12  03:56am

Reply To Message

3

otoh (54) REPLY TO #2 - TalonIcefire :

'In my study, Iíve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models.'

I have a shelf of racy books in my study, but you, sir, show true dedication :)

01-29-12  03:12pm

Reply To Message

4

TalonIcefire (6) REPLY TO #3 - otoh :

Why thank you sir. I sometimes consider myself a connoisseur to the natural beauties in life.
01-30-12  02:43am

Reply To Message

5

Mort (5) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

Yes, I have also just made the mistake of re-joining for another look, and am even more disappointed than a few years ago. Really boring photosets - the latest look like 20 or so shots of almost identical poses (perhaps a hand moved?) and the girls are way too made up or photoshopped for any of their natural appeal to show.
A site to avoid if you are looking for anything with lasting interest in pics, and the videos are no better.
Oh well, I won't be renewing or getting caught again.

09-18-12  02:30am

Reply To Message

6

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #5 - Mort :

Yes, those differences between one pic and the next are pretty subtle. Looks more like the work of a crime scene photographer sometimes, if you know what I mean.
09-19-12  05:12am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.