Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Just Nips

Just Nips (0)

Capn (28) 01-18-12  09:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Over 500 amateur models featured.
They do mean amateur too. There is everything here from petite boyish to BBW, barely legal to mature, stunningly pretty, through 'next door' to downright scary!

+ Models seem to enjoy themselves. Always a plus to me.
The Webmaster seems to be directly involved in the shooting & whilst encouraging going to full body nudity, does not press the models to do anything they are not comfortable with.
The flip side of this is that he doesn't stop them if they are enjoying themselves. ;)
+ The models are treated with respect
+ Full strips to nude appears to be the norm, sometimes a variety of outfits are featured(..briefly).
+ Zips available
+ HD Video available.
Not being a video guy I really can't give a view on this other than they look OK to me.
+ Site is nicely presented & functional, especially so given this is not a big budget operation.
+ Friendly & communicative Webmaster, who also does the photography.
+ Comprehensive FAQ page
Cons: -Some info. seems fragmented & conflicts. At writing, the header on the Amateur page says 44985 pics/651 videos/402 Amateurs. Very out of date. Same page lower down 581 Sessions 76337 Images 2237 Videos. No mention of the currently 517 models.
-Sets seem rushed, there are very few fully clothed shots, often even the fleeting one or two often are not full body shots. It would be nice to to have ten or a dozen or so fully clothed shots before the stripping just to assess & build up anticipation.
-When the model has come with a variety of outfits, there is very little material featured of each. That rushed feeling again.
-Not a lot of material of each model available. A few return for another shoot, but not many. The studio location is something to do with that. Thumbnails crop the full image. Sometimes a vert. format thumbnail hides a hor. format shot.
-Only 1 pic res. available typ.1200x800
-Zip files need renaming, they come with a sequential number only.
-Barely any model bio
Bottom Line: Well, owing to a neat trial deal I took the plunge & thought I would share my findings.

Updates are 2 - 3 a week.
Split between photoset & video is roughly 50/50

Possibly because of the specific naming & targetting of this site it had slipped under my radar. Whilst the material is almost exclusively softcore, it features quite a bit more than the just topless material the site naming implies.
I am pleased I tried it, because it is pretty much on topic for my FC2N fetish! ;)
( Fully clothed to nude...An acronym coined by my friend Auxilia )

For me, the style needs to be expanded. Specifically, the rushed feeling needs to be addressed.
The Webmaster is aware of it and has lengthened the shoots from 1 hour to 3 IIRC
I do feel, the uploaded sets still need editing more benignly though, as I mentioned above.
As it stands there are only a few shots in each set which hit the spot for me.
They are there, in ones & twos but I just need a lot more of that style in each set.

If you are looking for anything other than solo softcore then really this site is not for you.
If however, you like me, like seeing geniune amateurs strip naked....it is certainly worth a punt.

I should also mention that some of the models featured are in advanced stages of pregnancy, in some cases I quite like that, but know others don't.

It is so near.
Another nearly, but not quite for me.

In case you didn't realise, both the pros & cons would have been longer but in both cases I ran out of space! :0(

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


tangub (155) Great review Cap'n. Is that a full access trial without any download restrictions? I'm not implying that i'd want to download the whole site for the $7 trial as like you i have absolutely no interest in the vids so think the 7 day trial might be a good deal just to grab the photosets that interest me.
01-18-12  10:13am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :


I'm pleased you found it useful, tangub.

Yes, so far as I could tell access was complete for the 7 days of the trial. Very fair, I thought.

For me, it is potentially a very good site, if the issues I raised were resolved. As it is primarily a nipple fetish site though, I doubt that they will be.

Cap'n. :0)

01-18-12  10:25am

Reply To Message


BubbaGump (18) Nice review.

What is the percentage of different model figures? Is it mostly models on the thin side and a few voluptuous women or distributed all around?

01-18-12  04:41pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #3 - BubbaGump :

Thank you.

It pans out close to RL really, although there is well above average amount of pregnant models.

Cap'n. :0)

01-18-12  04:56pm

Reply To Message


BubbaGump (18) It looks like something I would enjoy viewing. I have bookmarked it for future reference.

How would you rate the overall quality of photos? Are the images clear and crisp or somewhat lacking? I looked at a few of the sample images and they looked a little bit like scans of 35mm film. Or perhaps that is simply due to the lower quality of the samples and them not giving away the best.


01-18-12  06:15pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #5 - BubbaGump :

Overall, I would class them as average. Sets are usually well lit, and shot nicely. I think the problem was more in the equipment used. More recent stuff is shot with higher res equipment & noticeably better for it. Nothing here is ultra high resolution as yet.

Cap'n. :0)

01-18-12  11:32pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.