Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls (5)

Newbie
83*
LePornoisseur (1) 12-17-11  03:43pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Consistent. Not much has changed since I was a member 2 years ago.
-The girls. If you like sexy white chicks that run the gamut from avg. to gorgeous, you'll get something out of FTV. (they have an exotic non-white girl here and there).
-Girls inserting large objects. One unique aspects of FTV is their penchant for having the girls stick massive vegetables and/or fruits inside them. Once in a while they'll shove a hand or fist in there for good measure.
-I was able to download zipfiles of pics rather quickly.
-Lots of hot videos of girls masturbating.
-Little synopsis of the scene and the director describes shooting with the model.
Cons: -The layout is a bit cumbersome. Also, visually they could reconfigure the site so it's more intuitive to navigate instead of just scrolling down...FOREVER.
-The girls' names! It seems more often than not FTV always has the names of the girls listed differently than what they are everywhere else. This is probably a testament to their ability to locate the newest, hottest girls. However, it's a pain in the butt to us pic collectors who would like to organize all of our pics by model. Thankfully there are unaffiliated blogs on the web that list girls by their FTV name AND their porn names.
-The price. They need to lower that price a bit. In my opinion this is good for once every two years but for less than half the price I can get better content.
-The video content meanders a bit. and I'm not a big fan of how they edit by splicing right in the middle of a scene so there's a slight jump in the audio and video.
Bottom Line: I seem to join this site every 2 years or so. I like FTV a lot, but for what it is, they should be commanding a subscription rate of $19.99. Even then, I think that's a bit too high. I give it an 83 because it is solidly a VERY GOOD site. However, there are solo glamor-shot type sites that in my opinion are slightly better, and update more frequently. With my latest stint with FTV coming to a conclusion in a matter of days, I definitely enjoyed my subscription this time around...see you in another two years FTV, maybe.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) A nice gambit there, LeP.

Considered and informative.

Welcome to PU.

Cap'n. :0)

12-18-11  03:39am

Reply To Message

2

rearadmiral (328) Great review - and welcome to PU.

Does FTV Girls still have their videos in segments rather than a full-length video? And if they do, so they start each segment with a 10 second title screen? Those were the two things that bugged me about them.

12-18-11  05:46am

Reply To Message

3

elephant (65) Nice review LePornoisseur and welcome, I do agree with you $19.99 would be a price I'd join for, I'm not a solo girl fan and would only grab the lesbian vids since I was last a member and a few solo girls who were stunners but not really worth it for the $29.99 as there are other sites I've got to join that have more porn I'd be into.
12-18-11  07:40am

Reply To Message

4

otoh (54) Again, thanks for the review - this is another site on my list as I quite like the level it's pitched at - from what I've seen it's explicit but not hardcore but there's an element of risky locations and no cheesy BGM (are all the videos without music?) both of which I like.
12-18-11  10:28am

Reply To Message

5

tangub (151) A good first review. Although i've never been a member here you summed up the issue that puts me off joining which is basically the price. For me it's nearly 35 bucks to join here and being a pic collector i'm not even interested in their videos so i can't bring myself to pay that just for their photo collection which is far inferior in resolution to sites like Met Art of MPL Studios. At $20 i probably wouldn't think twice about signing up. Welcome to PU by the way.
12-18-11  10:30am

Reply To Message

6

LePornoisseur (1) REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral :

Yes RA! It is quite annoying. The video sets (which are basically comprised of a girl's visit to FTV land) are still broken.
12-18-11  12:18pm

Reply To Message

7

LePornoisseur (1) REPLY TO #4 - otoh :

Otoh...no music on any of the clips I dl'ed, thankfully. I can't stand the ones with music-beds either (mostly because I edit my videos to the portions I enjoy). The quality on the vids has improved since I was last a member. Much higher resolution now.
12-18-11  12:22pm

Reply To Message

8

rearadmiral (328) REPLY TO #6 - LePornoisseur :

Is there still a bit of exhibitionism and public nudity in most of the sets? That was a big plus for me.
12-18-11  01:11pm

Reply To Message

9

LePornoisseur (1) REPLY TO #8 - rearadmiral :

Yes. Actually, damn near every set has a public nudity theme to it. If you're into that, there's tons of it!
12-18-11  04:18pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.