Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy (1)

monty4321 (3) 12-12-11  03:46pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)


Natural lighting?
Does this website do a lot of photo editing that causes the models to have unnatural colors or causes the pics to look unnatural.

How are the poses? Are there a bunch of useless poses without having that good shot you're waiting for or missing some of those basic poses.

They should at least have these basic poses:
1)(full body nude shot with good clarity/detail) standing or lying down
2)(boob shot) from the waist up to include the cute face of the model
3) (vagina shot) model laying down on back with legs spread, but also with her face in view without being out-of-focus. Kind of like a missionary pose.

Are they there?

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (4)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) Hi Monty,

There is a good deal of variation in quality as they use quite a few photographers at once and not all are first rate.

That said, it isn't usually lighting that gives a problem, it is usually focus & framing issues.

The poses vary with models, but generally there is a weighting in favour of held open & toy use, neither of which I care for.

The site owner has been asking for more standing full body shots;always at a premium; with limited success.

1) You get some of, although a lot are spoilt with excessive 'touchy, feely.'
2) Is usually fairly well covered.

3) There is some of that but usually they go for the closer in shot.

The coding on the site is arguably its best feature. The user defined custom zips are very slick & useful. Basil is always very helpful & attentive, but is limited by what his contract photogs supply.

I don't want to urn this into a mini review, but I would say it was worth a month's punt to see for yourself.

Cap'n. :0)

12-12-11  04:09pm

Reply To Message


monty4321 (3) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Thanks Capn,

I may go ahead and give it a try soon. Though I am bit discouraged. I went to the site and noticed that I can look at the thumb nails of the sets - it seems there is no uniformity in poses amongst the sets. All of the sets seem random with random poses. When the sets are so random, I fear they won't get any of the basic poses.

I liked KarupsPC because all of their photo sets are uniform. I know some people think that's boring. But at least I know that I will get the poses that I want. I don't mind the random poses, just want to make sure that I also get the basics too.

But I still may try the site out.

12-12-11  04:28pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) I would like to see full frontal body shots, standing, with panties still up more often. That's my greatest regret, that too many photographers think it is more artistic to have the model bend forward with thumbs hooked in the waistband with the panties partially down already, or that they show the model from the rear while she is taking off her panties.

Only one or two frontal, standing, panties all the way up pictures would be enough to satisfy me! :-)

12-13-11  03:23pm

Reply To Message


kinkyking (0) Exactly!! This site was a total disappointment, the poses for me are everything, specially the vagina shot and not all the models have them. The overall on photo sets are lame, too many "regular" poses that you can find in any free site. In fact, I don't mind if they are regular or ugly woman, as long as I can see a very good photo set, because the truth, there are a lot of sites with stuning models with to much make up and after a some years watching porn...I'm tired of these...

And after these, my problem now if it's worth to pay for ATK, because I don't want to waste my money again.

01-25-13  08:16am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.