Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (2)

Active
90
Cybertoad (104) 09-22-11  06:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Fast Downloads
HD Videos Over 1000 not all HD
Over 1 Million photos.
Over 2500 Models
Been in the business 12 years
No Drm
Over 100 Updates a month.
Cons:
Repetitive Content
Lots to navigate through
Over picture& video quality is ok.
$19.99 Membership
Recurring every 30 days at $19.99
$39.99 for 30 days To big of a difference as you can not download the site in a month.
Bottom Line:
This is the top of the line best SoftCore nude site on the planet.

There are varies formats, pic Divx its the best picture format for their production work.
The site is huge with over " ONE MILLION " photos and over 2500 models. There are about 100 updates per months and it one huge site.

I do not want duplicate others reviews on PU and most details are recently covered, so a twist on review here.

The site is very high quality site, the models are gorgeous, I could hardly find one that was not drop dead model material.
Compared with 99% of the websites we review this one has to be the classiest site of all.
They have worked 12 years and respectfully stayed successful in soft-core porn.
Why other sites are reaching to find a new level.
Met Art takes things to a new level in quality nude women.

The look and feel of the site is like going to a high class show in Vegas. The site feel like they are kings of the Softcore and have numerous photographers that get the shots right.
There are gratuitous scenes in the collection, but nothing that would be known as Hardcore.
That said, I am sure many will love the curves and erotic nature in how hey present.
This is not playboy tame, nor hustler slutty, it fits nicely enough to a niche in its own class.

Bottom line:

Price is tad high as you will have to stay a member awhile if you plan on full site collections. They take CCbill and Epoch so thats helpful. I like the navigation as its not that hard to find stuff even though the site is huge.
They appears to be free stuff but never had time to look at it. Site may have similar scenes and format. But hard to avoid in 12 years in business, so why it is in my cons, it is expected.

Toads Take.
Its worth a peak, even for a month. If you have not seen a softcore site or avoided them because you thought you would fall asleep with lube in your hand. Rest assure this site will excite and is erotic enough to peak the interest.

I never finished the site before my subscription ran out. But I have a nice collection
A site that is up 12 years will never get the review it deserves. I tried to give some details that may do that justice if at all possible.

Hope you enjoyed my review.

CT.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

slutty (111) Nice review Cybertoad, I agree with all your good and bad points, this site is definitely a great soft site.
09-22-11  11:42pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) I think your review makes sense. The major point I disagree with is you only scored Metart as 90. I personally think it deserves a higher score.

But I can live with that. Lol.

09-23-11  04:25am

Reply To Message

3

gaypornolover (38) It might be pricey but WOW what a huge site! A million photos - it didn't realise such a site existed! It would certainly take a long, long time to look at all those pics! Photo sites aren't my thing but this is an excellent review, well done.
09-23-11  06:39am

Reply To Message

4

BradlyH (11) Nice review Toad, You are ripping the site up with Reviews lately, it's awesome.

I was a member at met art about half a year ago and i enjoyed it too, I received a discounted price also which made it that much better. I agree it does get repetitive after a while, the sheer size and amount of models almost start to blend even when the camera work is as it's finest. But at least we couldn't complain about Lack of Content !

09-23-11  10:31am

Reply To Message

5

Cybertoad (104) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Hi Ike,
Yea I did dabble with a thought of a higher score. The repetitive stuff in my head made it hard for me to give it over what I did.
But it was not easy if that helps. I guess I was thinking in 12 years, maybe a tad more cutting edge should occur. How they would do that ? LOL I have no idea, but my brain tells me would be interesting to see where they would branch and how. It was Kinda like watching happy days back in the 70's/ At first it was like wow what a concept going back to the good old days, wen cool was cool. But seasons went by and cool became eh its cool. I think in repetitive thinking I am there with this site, its cool ...... but kinda thing. Hope that helps you have an idea where I got the score from.?

09-23-11  07:12pm

Reply To Message

6

Capn (28) A solid review of a classic site.

I'm afraid though what I said in my comment last year still holds true for me.

'I appreciate this purports to be an artsy site, and I can take that at face value.
What really disappoints me about this site is the lack of variety & creativity.

It is all very formulaic & repetetive.
Sure beautiful girls, scantily clad to nude, usually outside.

Most of the thumbnail set 'covers' blend into each other.
There is so much material, I am bound to have missed a few gems in there, but searching through the 'covers' to find one that stands out gets dull.

A shame, but that is the way it strikes me.'

Cap'n :0/

09-24-11  12:55am

Reply To Message

7

RLane (16) Very nice review, but the picture quality is better than okay. Sometimes for new updates they have either 7000px or 5000px sets.
12-11-11  02:02pm

Reply To Message

8

Cybertoad (104) REPLY TO #7 - RLane :

I agree with you on the pixels, but in quality I found the way it was done was ok. I think knowing it was a large picture I thought would give a better photo then it did. There are other sites with large HD video and the quality is still not better then smaller sizes. To give a site a 90 I think it is done very well. I don't give out any reviews above 89 unless the site is exceptional. And why the site is very good, I found it has room to grow. Problem is the better a site is, the more picky reviews get above 90 for me. I start looking at details and ease of site. Things other sites strive to get reviewed, So I really like this site, I am just really picky on my reviews at 90 and above.

Appreciate the feedback.

CT

12-11-11  03:54pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.