Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy (1)

messmer (137) 08-21-11  07:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (1)

Something I swore I would never do ...

... because I like the webmaster and his enthusiasm too much but I would ask all those who read my review to take off at least 10 points if they are not into a "hair" fetish.

Nine updates this month alone feature models with hairy legs! Mind you, this still leaves 51 fairly straight updates, but the site is starting to look way too earthy for me to feel comfortable seeing it listed at a whopping 99 under my name.

Therefore to all ye who may be tempted to subscribe: if you are into body hair in general, including anal, pits, arms, legs, this site will still rate very highly with you given all its good points. The quality, the lay-out, the search engine, the updates, the friendly and helpful webmaster are all still there.

If, on the other hand, you like clean looking girls who have remained traditional by keeping their pubic hair but who shave their legs (as everyone except for hippies and women in rural Transylvania did for as long as I can remember,) then an 89 would be a more realistic rating for you these days.

This is still a pretty good score for a pretty good site, I think! And with a bit of sifting you'll still get a lot of good stuff. I just don't like to see my 99 connected with hairy legs! Ever! :-)

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (9)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Basil (16)
Webmaster
Hello Messmer,

In August there were 77 updates published on WeAreHairy.com (not 60 as you say because some of the updates like records of liveshows aren't shown on the tour page) and 9 updates is a mere 12% of total content released.

That's more or less the same volume of updates with hairy legs we had when you were a happy member. If these 12% upset you so much you can always disable them in "My settings" menu, it'd take you just two seconds to do it.

Basil

08-21-11  09:41pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Basil :

I do not recall one single set that contained hairy legs when I was a member, so to see 9 in the first 2/3rds of a month was a shock and a clear indication that you are starting to give in to the extreme crowd.

Let me make a prediction: they will clamor for more and more contents, like hairy legs, on a persistent, never ending basis and you will end up just like ATK Natural and Hairy. Which truly would be a shame. I guarantee you now that the fetish content of your site will not stay at 12%. No doubt I could filter out hairy legs, arms, asses, backs, anuses ... I am just saddened that you chose that road. But in this age of excess I have no doubt you will be successful despite my criticism.

m.

08-22-11  10:00am

Reply To Message

3

monty4321 (3) REPLY TO #1 - Basil :

No Offense to you - but I can do a little unshaven. But when you throw in the hairy legs, hairy back, and so on - that's over-kill and discussing. Have you guys ever considered creating a site for those minority who likes that? That way you can keep We Are Hairy the way the majority likes it? Just wondering?
11-01-11  08:41pm

Reply To Message

4

monty4321 (3) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

I was considering ATK natural and hairy. Are they really that bad with the hairy legs and crap?
11-01-11  08:43pm

Reply To Message

5

Basil (16)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #3 - monty4321 :

We're considering this, in the mean time you can disable these categories in less than 5 seconds by going to "My settings" menu. Thanks!

Basil

11-01-11  08:49pm

Reply To Message

6

monty4321 (3) REPLY TO #5 - Basil :

Thanks Basileus - thanks for your reply.
11-01-11  08:55pm

Reply To Message

7

messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - monty4321 :

Yes, they have become that bad, monty. At least they were when I was a member recently. We Are Hairy would be a better choice for you at the moment. Especially since they increased their updates to four a day. In their case I am just worried about the trend to cater to a more radical crowd at the expense of the "normal" lovers of a hairy pubis.
11-02-11  09:40am

Reply To Message

8

monty4321 (3) REPLY TO #7 - messmer :

Hey messmer. I like natural lighting in photos. Does this website do a lot of photo editing that causes the models to have unnatural colors or causes the pics to look unnatural?
12-12-11  03:40pm

Reply To Message

9

messmer (137) REPLY TO #8 - monty4321 :

Hi Monty, I find this site generally very good when it comes to natural colors. It will change from photographer to photographer, of course, but generally you don't find any of those hateful orange-y skin tones that other sites seem to major in.
12-13-11  08:46am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.