Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Tainster

Tainster (0)

Newbie
60*
Jaimes (3) 07-29-11  01:17pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a mega site that includes the two powerhouse flagships Drunk Sex Orgy and Party Hardcore. Beautiful women. Good cinematography. Quality video downloads. For those into C.F.N.M, extreme bondage, and other like minded trends, there is plenty to admire.
Cons: Tainster, to begin with, is an awful name and it is an omen to what tastes the creator has decided to focus on. This sight has been built from the superior bones of Orgy Maxx. Eromaxx has always been a very bizarre frustration for me. Drunk Sex Orgy, one of the most brilliant ideas in the porn universe: huge orgies shot with quality equipment in sophisticated nightclubs, has been rendered nearly impotent by it's constant fantasy betrayals, like using the same exact cast while 75% of the rest of the girls remain fully clothed. Frustrating and ridiculous. Another great idea: the shower hose on stage, is usually rendered a prop for more frustration. Very rarely do pretty girls get naked under it. They just tease us in between the "set" cast pieces. Party Hardcore is even more frustrating. I don't care if it's real or not. Seeing 6-7 girls get naked out of 75-100 is, again, frustrating. Those are the two big flagship sites. Rest, in my opinion, should NOT even be bundled with orgy sites.
Bottom Line: I was disappointed years ago, but it still had enough promise that I went back hoping to find the old Orgy Max stuff in better quality (I only have lousy MPEG versions of the old stuff)as the founder promised back in 2010.

To my shock, Tainster had pretty much taken them all out! Drunk Sex Orgy only has the events from 2007 on, while Wam Sex is completely gone, replaced by soft core All Wam.(where in many of the events no one even gets naked!)

Instead Tainster offers up useless cam shows (in an upgraded package) and sites that feature Bukkake, C.F.N.M, or worse. (not my cup of java) And then there is the silliness of Party Softcore. Um,... note to the special kind of idiots: TOPLESSNESS IS NOT PORN!!!

There is SOME good stuff. Enough for say, a months perusing. There is a fair amount of pictures and videos. Even entire DVDs.(but if you are like me and hate to watch anything over 5 minutes on your computer, it means probably transferring the MP4 format to a DVD player format with a significant loss of quality)

However, the death of the old Orgy Max material is the major tragedy, as there is NO place to buy this material. (I should note, I have purchased every one of the D.S.O. and Party Hardcore DVDS, except six, to date. I plan on editing them into much more fantasy enabling, but with better music, masterpieces some day)

As to the actual Tainster site itself, it is not as user friendly as it could be, with very noisy menus and clunky features.

The price has been lowered a little since the Orgy Maxx days but it still is nearly $40.00. (depending on the dollar fluctuation of the Euro) A bit steep for those interested in only the straight orgy sites.

But if you like C.F.N.M, Bondage,Bukkake and the like, you will find much more to enjoy here.

Me? I am going to start wearing black all the time. Grieving for the loss of Orgy Maxx and the incremental decline of non frustrating porn in general...

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

mbaya (356) I appreciate that we don't have identical tastes. One thing I have always liked about PU is that we are openminded regarding what we like. Calling CFNM or extreme bondage as sick is just not what I expect to see on PU, sorry. As for your characterization of "sick and stupid sites that feature Bukkake, C.F.N.M, or worse" is just not something that is right. To each his own is a much better philosophy. Please don't take my comments to mean your views are not welcome, just don't be judgemental regarding taste.
07-31-11  03:27pm

Reply To Message

2

Jaimes (3) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

Mbaya, you are right. It is an unfair judgement call on my part. I should have been more specific and said, that, in my opinion, it is sick to me. But I still maintain that certain genres should be kept out of the mainstream. I still maintain that C.F.N.M is ruining porn. I watch porn to see girls get naked. If you don't, that's fine, but please don't have it leak into my genre. This is not the movies where you can mix and match genres and it's fun. This is porn. I see cute girls, I want to see them naked. Just like in a mystery; you see a gun in the first act, it better be used by the third. I can't tell you how much this frustrates me. It is simply inconceivable to my brain that folks would enjoy this torture but again, to each his own, just don't let it leak into MY mainstream.
07-31-11  03:39pm

Reply To Message

3

petefountain (6) I normally agree with mbaya and find his/her reviews very helpful.

In this case, however, I did not think you meant to criticize other people's tastes in porn. As I read your review, you were looking for real orgy scenes, and Tainster did not provide the kind you were looking for; namely, lots of available pussy and amateurs who are really enjoying themselves. With all the niches on the Internet, one would think there would be lots in this sub-niche, but there is not.

A couple of sites come to mind. Orgy Sex Parties and College Wild Parties have small porn star orgies with lots of other observers. Porn star orgies tend to max out at 4 couples and most focus on one couple because it is too hard to film everyone at once. The camera always seems to be pointed in the wrong place. For example, the camera is on a girl giving a blow job when you would rather watch a really hot couple fucking in the background.

Some new sites attempt to fill this gap but none are truly orgy sites.

SwingerSakse, DareDorm, CollegeRules, FuckTeamFive

Anyone that knows of true amateur orgy sites with lots of naked females, please port that information.

08-20-11  08:22am

Reply To Message

4

qted (0) Jaimes,As a former member of Orgymaxx, Eromaxx and Tainster, I completely agree with you when you say "the death of the old Orgy Max material is the major tragedy". I have emailed Tainster regarding this issue,and even offered to purchase the 2004-2006 episodes of Party Hardcore, Wam Sex Orgy and Drunk Sex Orgy. The reply was that these episodes will be added shortly-that reply was over 12 months ago. In my opinion the Party Hardcore and Drunk Sex Orgy sections of the site are still reasonable,but are far removed from the "parties" of 5-6 years ago. Drunk Sex Orgy ,in particular is becoming very monotonous and predictable,while Party Hardcore's greatest attraction is Gina Killmer as moderator.While it is commendable that the price for the Tainster site has been reduced in the last 18 months,their over reliance and saturated publicity of cam shows is a bit annoying.But,obviosly,that depends on one's perspective of cam shows.Finally,Jaimes if you could help in attaining the above mentioned episodes, it would be very much appreciated.
12-26-11  11:57pm

Reply To Message

5

Jaimes (3) REPLY TO #4 - qted :

qted: Exactly! And adding Gina to Party Hardcore is not particularly
a bonus-she never gets naked these days, and it is odd that when the males M.C. they always get naked, but when it is a girl, she never gets naked. Does no one realize that it would be far more exciting if the female M.C.s got naked (or even participated once in a while) while M.C.ing. Sadly I do not see this trend waning. Too many people like C.F.N.M. Myself, I just don't understand the appeal at all.

12-27-11  04:05am

Reply To Message

6

Jaimes (3) REPLY TO #3 - petefountain :

petefountain:thank you for your response. Indeed, I did not mean to offend anyone. But I do think that C.F.N.M should stay in it's own backyard, so to speak. But more and more it is seeping into all kinds of porn; from Parodies (Not Married With Children) to websites.(the aforementioned COLLEGE RULES, DARE DORM and FUCK TEAM FIVE all have had their share of C.F.N.M seepage. Also V.I.P., V.I.P. CREW and REAL SLUT PARTIES)Sometimes you get lucky, but most of the time they show you a bunch of cute girls (and waste a lot of time doing so) that don't even get naked. As you alluded to, on average you might see 2-4 girls actually get naked or participate. (and in the case of Party Hardcore and Drunk Sex Orgy almost NEVER the real cute ones that the cameramen seem to tease us consistently with) In the scheme of things, say, when you compare it to real issues like Global Poverty and possible Nuclear War,it is a niggling thing, but gosh,it is damn annoying
12-27-11  04:16am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.