Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit CFNM.net

CFNM.net (1)

gaypornolover (38) 07-26-11  10:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)

Update to review

As I'm at my word limit for my review and I haven't had personal experience of this, I thought I'd do this as a comment update rather than try and edit my review.

According to a CFNM forum I have read, CFNM.net are up to their old tricks. Not only do their best videos remain on the never-updated, DRM-riddled CFNM.TV which requires a seperate, pricey subscription, they have now apparently announced that they have "responded to users requests" and are stopping doing any more videos.

This happened IN THE MIDDLE of a new series, so was was a video series is now photos only! In future, only photosets will be relesased.

For the price they charge I am astonished. As I said as I haven't personally confirmed this, and as I have no intention of paying their high subscription fee just to confirm the worst, I won't change my review or rating but add this for info and a warning to others!

The money they charge for the photosets they do, which don't even have particularly large or good quality pictures, makes this site a real no-no in future in my opinion. SO sad because they have the best ideas and models! Sad.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (7)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (316) I know some people prefer photos over videos, but I highly doubt that there were any 'user requests' to stop shooting videos. That's pretty fishy...
07-26-11  04:09pm

Reply To Message

2

Capn (28) REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :

I am not a video person, but I would never ask a site to stop doing video. It is quite absurd.

It just doesn't ring true at all.

Cap'n. :0/

07-27-11  09:48am

Reply To Message

3

rearadmiral (316) REPLY TO #2 - Capn :

Yup... defintiely something fishy.
07-27-11  01:05pm

Reply To Message

4

gaypornolover (38) REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :

I agree - the site was always primarily a photosite but half-heartedly did add some videos later. Even then though they kept the photos, so even if you hated videos why would you demand they be removed as long as the photos remained?

To stop doing videos right in the middle of a series is particularly annoying and unfair to paying customers.

The irony is I never thought their photos were that great anyway - clear enough but hardly the big sizes you'd expect from a photo-only site.

All very disappointing. Even if they reversed this decision it puts me off rejoining the site because they seem to think nothing of reversing decisions on a whim, so who says they wouldn't do it again?

So many sites have great content wrecked by this awful attitude to customner service, sadly this is one of them!

07-27-11  08:35pm

Reply To Message

5

rearadmiral (316) REPLY TO #4 - gaypornolover :

"Awful customer service"... sadly that seems to be a very common thread among porn sites...
07-28-11  03:21am

Reply To Message

6

manholelover (24) I can't imagine members actually asking them to stop doing videos. They probably can't afford the costs involved. As it's from the same company that makes StraightHell.com, and their weird insistence that the site remain banned in the UK to maintain the anonymity of the performers (still waiting for my reply from their editor), it does all seem a bit fishy. And yes, given that loads of their photos are seen on blogs such as Gay Demon and Queerclick.com, I doubt if it would be worth paying the subscription.
08-06-11  11:51am

Reply To Message

7

gaypornolover (38) REPLY TO #6 - manholelover :

Yeah this network of sites is really annoying and disappointing me. They make some of the best porn in the business and then ruin it with crappy service and stupid site policies.

I think if they improved the service they could afford things - I'd love to know what their site turnover rate is - must be the highest in the industry!

Not surprised Straighthell didn't get back to you - they probably won't. Whatever the real reason, and the "anonymity of models" excuse is so patently ludicruous it's insulting - they're not going to change it any time soon.

I've just cancelled my subscription to another of their sites - First Auditions - updates too erractic, no new Groping Hands, expensive - it's just not worth staying a member - just go in and out every few months.

08-06-11  02:02pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.