Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit UK Amateur Vids

UK Amateur Vids (0)

m341ehw (8) 07-11-11  07:01pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1/ Content is genuine.
2/ British.
3/ Amateur.
4/ Dirty.
Cons: 1/ grab a seat before paying EXPENSIVE!!!!
2/ Most of content is shared with owners other site.
3/ No videos longer than 16 mins.
4/ A number of short 7 second videos!
5/ Videos are like a car boot sell every things mixed up.
6/ Bloody expensive.
Bottom Line: At the time of writing this there were 118 videos all of poor quality that said I don't like amateur videos in HD so thanks for not giving us the perfect video! How many women go out dogging with a camera hired or stolen from a Hollywood film studio? My problem and I beg the owner help is to vastly improve the length of the videos, for example there are around 40 videos that are under a minute long,
61 that are 1 to 5 minutes long,
13 that are 5 to 10 minutes long
3 that are 10 to 15 minutes long
1 that is 15 to 16 minutes long
0 that's 0! that are 16 minutes plus!

When the site opened it raves it had "108 videos added today" well most of them have been used from Rachels other site and I have been watching this site for well over a month and just 10 have been added!

Rachel stars in all but 32 of the videos, that said Rachel will just about fuck anybody bareback if your into this kind of thing and she's very attractive and gets into it.
Videos are all laid out on one page with no categories, would like to have seen some kind of order to the site.

Rachel if your reading please read my suggestions!

1/ Site costs about £33.00 which would bail out Greece for a week! Given the size of the site its very expensive.

2/ Please Rachel make some longer videos as a rule of thumb 7 or 8 seconds will not cut it and at that price it needs to be 25+ minutes!

3/ Price drop! your charging Rolls Royce prices and your just in the Lada range, you have what it takes to make it, sorry to say it again.

4/ Weekly updates! (tell everyone on the preview page when you added them) OK maybe every other week quality not quantity is so important.


Finally would I have joined knowing all this ...sorry to say the answers ....NO

That said if she takes on-board my advice then yes I would join again.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) A fan of British porn/models I keep looking.....
This does not seems like something for this user - both according to the preview and this review..........Thanks for the update/info....that's the review, I mean...

07-12-11  08:24am

Reply To Message


gaypornolover (38) HOW MUCH?! Wow that is eye-wateringly expensive for that amount of content... great review which hopefully will warn people off till they improve vastly! I want the best site in the world for that kinda money!
07-12-11  08:31am

Reply To Message


gaypornolover (38) Took a look at the site - if the videos are mostly as short as you say above, you might as well stick with the previews! They're all about 30 seconds long as there's dozens of em LOL!
07-12-11  08:38am

Reply To Message


m341ehw (8) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Hi Denner
I love British sites and I love the girl next door. It ticked the box for Rachel looking stunning, it ticked the box for being dirty and it ticked the box for OK video quality (not HD) don't want HD on a true amateur site, and it ticked the box for being genuine! everything was pointing to a worthy site. I hope that she takes some of my wishes on-board, she has the potential for a great site. If she did make the changes I would be the first to rejoin!

Thanks for the comments!

07-12-11  08:50am

Reply To Message


m341ehw (8) REPLY TO #3 - gaypornolover :

Hi Gaypornolover
Yes very expensive! I just hope that she can pull this site together it could be an excellent dogging/glory hole site, she just has to drop that price and increase the video time. lol I remember when 8 seconds was a long video on dial up!

Thanks for the comments

07-12-11  08:57am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #4 - m341ehw :

Oh, yes - have in my stash some of my favorites - now almost vintage - British models, pix and vids, which is foremost:
1) Misty McCain
2) Linda (or Lynda) Leigh
3) Louise Hodges
(and a lot others, of course)
Take a look at: http://videoangels.tv/

Not a great preview, but it's sure to be recommended for lovers of Brit models...

07-12-11  09:20am

Reply To Message


m341ehw (8) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

Bloody hell Denner that's a lovely looking site! Keep looking at the visa now... thanks.
I have to say in many ways I liked videos from back then No studios no HD and possibly filmed by the husband, lover or a stranger; just a normal beautiful girl from next door in a normal house, don't get me wrong I do like modern videos to... but I do have a passion for some of the older videos.

07-12-11  09:39am

Reply To Message


Jayne (6)
REPLY TO #3 - gaypornolover :

21 Preview videos is dozens??? LOL

Jayne x

08-30-11  04:18pm

Reply To Message


gaypornolover (38) REPLY TO #8 - Jayne :

LOL I'm prone to exaggeration! But I did enjoy them - some hot men - thanks! x
08-30-11  07:12pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.