| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
rearadmiral (238)
|
This looks like a site I might like. Thanks for posting this important tip. Chalk one more up to the PornUsers gang! And this only further highlights why having a reputable biller in your corner is a good thing.
Also, the previous review said that there were no zipped photo sets available. Is this still true? What was your impression of the site that you did have access to? Any details would be great.
Thanks
|
07-05-11 05:05pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
tangub (151)
|
Thanks for the warning, I had this small network of sites down as a possible join but the lack of zips (according to previous PU review) and the high monthly price of 40 bucks has so far but me off. I notice Segpay is the default biller and i wonder if the same problem would occur going through them. It doesn't say a lot for the customer service at the site if they'd rather lose your $79.99 than sort out a simple log in problem.
|
07-06-11 02:27am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Trip999 (4)
|
REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :
Hi. I agree with you exactly re what you said about going through tried and trusted billers. I always try to use Ccbill or Epoch wherever possible. Segpay was the default biller for this site but I opted for the Epoch alternative instead.
As was the case when artnoir reviewed Glamour Flower some time back there are still no zips available for members at this site, which is a shame and which also makes gathering quite laborious and time-consuming. But at the same time maybe makes you pay a bit more attention to what you are actually gathering! I joined the site to get hold of sets of a few models, namely Dary (aka Dariya A - see http://www.thenude.eu/Dariya_A_3194.htm), Petra E (see http://www.thenude.eu/Petra_E_5757.htm) and Sally (aka Sveta see http://www.thenude.eu/Candice_4822.htm) and there were some nice shots of these girls on the site. Checking some of the photos I see that they come in at 2592x3888 - certainly not to be sniffed at, but it should be said that some of the shots do come in a bit blurry sometimes. This may well be because some of the sets are shot in a public/'risque' setting (eg Dary flashing/exposing herself in a taxibus and in a metro subway, or Elizabeth doing the same out and about in a park) and the photographer is probably a bit less steady with their hands (and quite possibly not using a tripod!) than they would be in a confined studio setting. I liked the out-and-about/public exposure nature of these sets, though it should be mentioned that not all of the sets are like this. Many are run of the norm interior/exterior sets more usually seen elsewhere. Apologies if I've gone on a bit! Hope some of this is of interest to you.
|
07-06-11 02:17pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Trip999 (4)
|
REPLY TO #2 - tangub :
Hi there. No it certainly does not and I did email the Webmaster quite a few times to try and resolve the issue. But I only got the one reply. I thought (and suggested) that they might consider providing an alternate username/password for me to use, but got no reply. It's interesting what you suggest about the problem maybe not occurring if I'd opted to join using the primary biller (Segpay). Hadn't considered this as an issue before, but will bear in mind in future.
Yes, this site/network is indeed on the pricey side. Especially considering my recent payment of around the same amount for a yearly membership at MetModels*! (* using upgrade from membership at MetArt)
|
07-06-11 02:33pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
rearadmiral (238)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Trip999 :
Thanks for this information. I think that the fact that this is such an expensive network probably makes it unlikely that I'd join, but the lack of zips makes it certain that I wouldn't join. Having no zips in 2011 makes no sense for customer service.
|
07-06-11 03:55pm
Reply To Message
|
