Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network (0)

Active
88
exotics4me (463) 06-13-11  06:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Big network with some unusual niches in it and a love of fake cumshots, not as bad as it sounds.
- Any concern with billing shouldn't be, they made me a very good "stay" offer of more than half off, when declined, got the email saying canceled within seconds.
- Video tech specs are good, close to standard HD, but videos are shot in a more amateurish way, not saying the cameramen aren't good, but the videos seem to try to have a homemade look to them.
- Photo quality is very good,
- Definitely looks to be exclusive
- Major pro here, this site seems to love the use of download managers, will explain in BL. 3000 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Some of the sites, Massage Creep, Flexible Positions, are as good as most sites in those niches and would say Massage Creep is the best Massage site I've seen.
- Some interesting ideas where porn stars do things women on social sites do, like photos in mirror, to give the amateur feel to it and pull it off pretty well.

-
Cons: - Navigation is frustrating. My first example is that some models just aren't listed, Stephani Moretti as example, clicked her name, instead of seeing her updates, I got all the new updates from all models. Can't find her in the model list either and she has multiple sets on their various sites. Works pretty good on most and maybe this is just one rare case, but seeing that she's one of the models I really like that they have it stuck out to me.
- The fake sites are just silly. I'm sure it was funny the first few times, but they really should stick with the other sites they have and let those fake dicks and gallons of fake cum sites die off.
- Not always a con for me, but there are quite a lot of implants and tattoos here, that Freak Boobs site is just bad.
- Download speeds without a manager were bad, had broken files, sets not showing up 404 errors, but the download manager seems to have cured that problem.
Bottom Line: If I hadn't went back to using a download manager, Free Download Manager, I would have knocked at least 20 points off this network's score. I haven't been using DL manager lately on any sites. So when I started downloading from this site through my browser, the right click on the link would either give me a 404 error or start trying to stream the video, left click, save as worked better, but probably half of the files would stop downloading around 70% finished. Then there was the problem with the DL speed through the browser, I usually can get near or slightly above 2 MB/s or for better comparison 2000 KB/s instead, I was receiving 400 KB/s through the browser.

FDM saved the month though, using it, the site works really good and the download speeds are almost as high as I can receive from any site.

These fake sites on this network are a waste in my opinion. And it's not just one fake dick, fake cum sites, I'm counting five, though it looks like all have stopped updating except one and that one only updates once a month. Good move in my opinion.

The bad thing with one navigation problem, like with trying to find Stephani Moretti, is that I now don't know if the navigation for other models is showing all their content.

The good news is, they have some ideas going on in this network that I really liked. The Teen BFF site, though porn stars, brings a very amateur feel with the girls doing the mirror photos, the silly photos, that's pretty good for any of potential members that are used to seeing similar pictures on the social networking sites.

The technical quality is very good. The videos say HD, but from looking at the codec info, it's a little lower than 720p, I'm seeing 1250x702. The pictures are as good as you will see on a network, nice to see the clothed pictures in the zips too, 3000 long end on those.

Some unusual niches like Public Violations where you watch a video to see, a guy run up behind a woman and pull her shirt up or pants down or runs up and pulls his dick out. Video over. A few scenes on this site are public sex, so those are pretty good.

Massage Creep, Teen BFF, Flexible Positions, Real Ex-Girlfriends, 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18, Amateur Violations, Webcam Hackers, Jurassic Cock and Cruelty Party are all still updating, I think, one may just be a monthly update since its last update was in May, these sites are all very good. Those sites to me really boost this network with some interesting niches and plays on reality porn. Most of the models are well-known and most in these scenes are models I like, even if implanted and tattooed. Loved the Isis Taylor scenes.

Once past the download problems through browser and away from the fake cum sites, Freaks of Cock, Freaks of Boobs sites, this became a very good network. Nice quality, I don't mind that it's not 1080p as the files are big enough as it is. Overall, I would recommend it with the warning of the fake cum and Freaks sites and use of DL manager.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (322) I've just wrapped up a membership and agree with everything you wrote. Several of the sites are excellent and worth the subscription alone. I really liked Jurassic Cock and Massage Creep is very well done. I found myself watching the scene setup that I'd normally skip.

And the fake cock/cumshot sites... I can't imagine that these are a big draw but they must be since there are several sites that use them almost exclusively. I can see watching one or two for the bizarreness of them, but they get old fast.

And Public Violations is an interesting site too. It's obviously staged, but still fun to watch.

06-13-11  06:42pm

Reply To Message

2

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :

I had initially credited Massage Creep to Brazzers, but caught it last week when I submitted the review. I had been on another Massage site, the one on the Teen Mega World network and thought Massage Creep was way better than it. You do get the feeling that most of their sites are genuinely trying to put a fun plot into their scenes, which is good to see. Kind of reminds me of the late 90s Vivid scenes I loved. The worst part for me on the fake cum/dick sites is the use of great models. Since I download by model, instead of by site, I ended up seeing some of my favorite models on these gallons of cum sites and thought, "what a waste".

Jurassic Cock is a fun one. I get some kind of kick out of watching Ron Jeremy work his charm and the girls seem really into him and the little skinny old guy too. I believe the network has more potential to go up as they start adding more to these better sites. What I didn't understand, on Public Violations, I downloaded a few videos from it that said 27-42 minutes on each one, then they were only 2-3 minutes. Maybe it was another of those download glitches and only downloaded a section of a full scene?

06-13-11  07:34pm

Reply To Message

3

rearadmiral (322) REPLY TO #2 - exotics4me :

My only experience with a massage site is with Massage Creep. I had low expectations because I find these single set-up sites can get boring. But I was pleasantly surprised to find that even though the scenes all follow the same structure they still manage to be hot. I'm sure a lot of the credit goes to the person hiring the girls.

As for Jurassic Cock, this was the reason I joined the network. I don't have an old-guy-young-girl thing, but TBP made it seem interesting so I joined and was really happy with it. I tend to search out a lot of older porn (80s and 90s) and don't get a lot of exposure to new models so this site introduced me to a few that I'll continue to watch for.

I had the same thing with the reported scene lengths in Public Violations. Most of the scenes are really short anyway, and the many of the ones that have the wrong times listed seem to be over, so I think it is just a typo.

And finally, I will always question their decision to use so much of the fake-cock-fake-cum stuff. It makes no sense to me.

06-14-11  03:48am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.