Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Pinup Files

Pinup Files (0)

Active
65
sullivan (32) 07-12-07  08:39am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Features a number of glamour shots of stunning and gorgeous busty models: Denise Milani, Lorna Morgan, Taylor Kennedy, Erica Campbell, Anya/Busty Merilyn, Maria Swan/Jana, Monica Mendez, Bianca Beauchamp, Maggie Green, Amber Campisi..

Pretty extensive photo collection of Retro busty models from the 40's to the 70's.

Pretty good production values on video.

Professional website design
Cons: Aside from the retro material, everything on PinupFiles is scraps and leftovers from its (superior) sister site, Pinupglam. The tour makes you think that Files is the equal of Pinupglam, but it's not!

Updates only about once a week, and contemporary models' material is even more infrequent.

Video quality is low to moderate; most scenes are video taking during photo shoots; some scenes are too brightly lit or washed out by the sun.

Far too expensive at $25 per month ($20 recurring)
Bottom Line: Pinup Files and Pinup Glam have to be considered as a single enterprise. Glam is the superior site (unless you are interested in the Retro photo collection on Files); it has 90+ videos, avg. 5 min. long, covering all their top models, and a large collection of nice 'pinup' photoshoots. And as I mentioned in the Pros, they have some of the most beautiful busty models out there, all glamorous enough to be in Playboy, all with beautiful curves.

But there are 3 big frustrating things about these sites. First, they will do a model shoot with pictures and videos. Then they will divide the pictures up into 3 sets and edit the video into 3 different shorts. And then they will dribble out the sets and the video shorts, publishing them over a long period of time - in some cases, as much as a year-and-a-half!

The second annoying thing is that Files is just a repository of scraps not available on Glam, designed to tempt the completist into spending another $25. It only has about 25 movies, which cycle through, so that they are not even all available at the same time.

Finally, they don't update very frequently, and thin everything out with their retro material.

Bottom line: if you like the models they have, and want some sexy softcore videos of them posing and stripping, a 1-month subscription to Glam wouldn't be a bad deal.

The only thing Files will really give you is a lesson in how to water down excellent material and mislead your customers!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to sullivan!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.