Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Karup\'s Older Women

Karup's Older Women (0)

otoh (54) 01-07-11  09:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of material
- Daily movie and gallery updates
- Reasonably good navigation options
- Most models in 30s & early 40s, which works for me
- Good movie quality; streaming, download options and screen caps
- Some good/protracted strips from casual and business attire
- Would prefer a camerawoman rather than man for the interview/chat movies
Cons: - Age of models (some under 30) may stretch 'OW' for some
- Slightly retro design (although front end has been updated; am sure member area will follow)
- Very typical lighting/sets/premise for all scenes
- Many models a little too enhanced for my taste, and relatively few unshaved
- Very little girl-girl content
- Could use a few more navigation options
- Older movies are lower quality and split into parts.
- Some daft fake uniforms and hackneyed outfits (newer sets are redressing this, thankfully)
Bottom Line: Looking for girls up to around my own age (40), it was a choice between this, Anilos and All over 30. They all look similar and suspect they offer similar content; the quality of samples I found on TGPs just tipped the scales in favour of Karups OW. (Interestingly, they include bonus content from, and link some models to, the other two sites.)

There is a lot of material here, it's a bit daunting at first! On top of that, they add a new movie AND a new photo set 6 days a week, so it is growing at a good rate. Navigation is fine; 4 categories of pictures and two of movies - although with the amount of material, we could use more, and/or the ability to sort each list by model name or date added.

Most of the material is soft, with maybe a quarter hardcore; the latter isn't really my thing, but actually the scenes are relatively well-positioned and I enjoyed them. Of the softcore, it's probably about 50/50 between toys and fingers; and there are some good strips and teases before getting to that point. Only a handful of girl-girl shoots and movies; I'd like to see more.

Movies are good quality, sharp and well-lit (even if slightly saturated) - 720p and each page shows a few download options and screen caps of the action, which is useful. This format goes back about a year and a half (a bit less for the screen caps); before that, the movies are mostly SD and many are only available in parts. Image quality is OK; available in 1024px and 1500px which is just about acceptable; I'd prefer 2000px.

I was quite disappointed that so many of the models have fake:
- boobs (I'm no expert but could spot these a mile away)
- tans (and the lighting makes them look even more orange)
- smiles (only the minority of models show their personality and a range of expressions)

Natural is always better in my book, but it seems this is endemic in the milf genre. Similarly, I like a mixture of pubic hair arrangements; shaved, trimmed or natural - although I do prefer the latter and there are very few unshaved girls here. Am hoping it tells them something that the hairiest girl I found is their 4th top model! (Am planning to join We Are Hairy at some point to redress the balance.) OTOH, it's a little churlish to complain, given the quantity of material here.

Overall, nothing groundbreaking here but a good site nonetheless. Although I'm only staying one month, I've definitely got my $30 worth; I will likely join again sometime, but will probably try the other two sites beforehand.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) A fair and comprehensive opinion there.

It is one that I have been meaning to revisit, but the memory of an excess of silicon & the widespread shaven look has meant I have left it a little longer than perhaps I should have.

Good to know they are still updating consistently.

Thanks for the review.

Cap'n. :0)

01-08-11  05:56pm

Reply To Message


otoh (54) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Your review of All Over 30 was interesting, thanks - and I think I know what you mean by 'mainstream glam' - (actual) pearl necklaces and the like :| Do you think I'd find much else there that I didn't here?
01-09-11  02:21am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - otoh :

I'll put my reply to that under AO30,it will be more relevant there.

Cap'n. :0)

01-09-11  05:23am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) As I've written in various comments, I am forever being tempted to subscribe to this site and invariably find a fly in the ointment that stops me from doing so. Thanks to your great and detailed review it is the "enhanced" business that's bothering me this time. In your estimation what percentage of the models would carry fake boobs around with them? Thanks, and a rough guess is all that's necessary when it comes to a site this large! :-)
01-19-11  12:49pm

Reply To Message


otoh (54) REPLY TO #4 - messmer :

Hmm... a quick tally from my admittedly inexpert eye (some are quite convincing!) makes me think probably just under half - 40-45%? - of the models here have fake boobs.

That sounds like a lot - but again, this is a big site, with hundreds of models - so you'll likely find some that you like, and there are some good strips, teasing and lingerie, followed up by showing what's underneath.

If you've joined either of the other two sites mentioned, I'm pretty sure you'll see similar content to here. For me there are just enough natural girls here to warrant a one-off subscription.

01-19-11  02:39pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - otoh :

Darn it, I've been on the fence about this site long enough. I'm gonna do it. Thanks, otoh and Cap'n (who encouraged me in another reply) for giving me a needed push. :-)
01-19-11  04:02pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.