Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep (0)

Rotterdam854 (12) 01-03-11  06:33am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: HD Video Quality is sharp,adaptable to players
Initial Episodes were good,hot & enjoyable
Great Storylines,Video Lengths, Great Sex
Great Models,Sexy Chicks & Good MILF's also
Logging In,Access & Navigation are alright
Being Part of Porn Pros,good bonus sites
Pics,Screencaps look great in viewing/download
Cons: Busty Moms/MILF's,Big Tits are more common now
Infrequent Updates,usually in 10/30/45 days
Some issues with password & login, no FAQ section
Suggestions can't be handled by chat only email
Site seems to be having a burnout,nothing new
Only one of the masseur's gets the best subjects
Suggestions aren't taken up seriously at all
Bottom Line: Highly recommended as older content (2009) still remains the best ever.Was a time when it could no wrong & was better than other sites in the massage category, probably could give Fucked Hard18 a real run for its money. MC is priced well for such video content & quality, other sites are all $30 plus, viewers get a great deal from TBP

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) One thing about Massage Creep is that you never know if the camera work is going to be good enough or not. I liked it for scenes with Giselle (aka blond Alexis), Dani Cole, Lexi Diamond, and Nicole Raye. They gave good views of the "belly down flat" action, which I particularly crave.

And the April O'Neil scene was pretty good, too, as April provided a true sense of excitement. However, there was too much camera lingering at her face whilst the tapping was in progress.

Even worse in that way was the scene with Klaudia/Cindy/Hope. I was really looking forward to that one, but it sucked camera-wise. I sat there wondering what the fuck they thought they might be possibly be using the goddamn camera for.

This year, they've had too many slags, bitches with too much fat on the bods, ughh! At least it hasn't been everyone.

Stilll, I'm holding out hope: That they'll have Emma Mae and Katie Jordin doing the ocean of motion. And since they're doing Euro girls, why not Kitty Jane? (Yikes!) I might rejoin just for that!

Or Tori Black! Or Jenna Haze!!

01-03-11  04:58pm

Reply To Message


dracken (246) Nice review, the only thing that I'd recommend is adding more details. It's always better to have more info then less. For example you say "Logging In,Access & Navigation are alright" but what does that mean? alright could range from complex search functions to pre-set categories to model pages and tag pages...if that makes sense.

I only picked that example because I remember joining a site that was supposed to have good navigation to find that it was one long list of all the scenes the site had with no search function and crappy previews... bad memories there...

Anyhow, how would you say this site compares to fuckedhard18 which is also focused on massage? from your review and a quick glance on the tour page they look pretty similar.

01-03-11  09:00pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.