Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios (2)

Denner (233) 12-21-10  07:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (78), NO (0)

Better Vids than MetArt??????????

A comment or a question to the "conneseurs"....connaisseurs....here at PU!

We've had several good discussions about the (not viewing/tech) quality of MetArt vids - but the way they do erotica - or rather the way they do vids with a little too much "art" and less sexuality..

Just got back to some older MPL vids among my stash - AND: In spite of two SOMEWHAT similar sites (pix) those 1-2 years old vids has much more erotica that the stash I've got from MetArt..

Is that still up-to-date, is MPL still going strong (stronger) on fine/sexy softcore vids?

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) If it's a contest, I'd say that Nubiles and X-art have much more erotic vids than Met-art and MPL Studios. Nubiles has softcore and hardcore, the same with X-art, but the X-art approach is more softcore erotic, even when doing hardcore.

But if you are doing a straight comparison of MPL Studios and Met-art, then MPL Studios has more erotic videos.

Personally, I think the main value of Met-art and MPL Studios is in their photosets.

Nubiles and X-art have value in both their photosets and their videos.

X-art is the smallest site of the 4 sites. But if it had the same amount of content as the other 3 sites, I personally think it would be the best site to join. But that will never happen, because Met-art keeps adding content at a massive rate. And the other 2 sites are much larger than X-art.

But I think that all 4 sites are fine choices, to join. That's my personal opinion, because some PU members think Met-art is a waste of time and money.

12-21-10  08:44am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

It's certainly hard to disagree about Nubiles - and also now X-art in this deal - erotic, sensual, horny ect. solo vids....
And we could put in a couple of others.

I still find that those (in my stash) MPL-videos are so much better than MetArt - and it's really between those two I'd be great to hear some views from fellow PUs...

Anyway, I'm with you all the way here, lk2..

12-21-10  08:49am

Reply To Message

3

Lionheart (47) I also have been wondering about the style in which they shoot their movies in. I have heard great things about this site have been keeping my eye on it. I'm fine with directors making these movies more with an artistic flare as long as the actions is still good.
12-21-10  09:34am

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

I've stated my opinion on Met-art videos several times on the PU forums, and in my review of Met-art. And my opinion of Met-art videos has changed very little over the years. The Met-art videos have improved quite a bit since the first videos they posted, many years ago, on a technical basis. But almost all Met-art videos are, in spite of lovely young models, boring and a waste of time to watch. Met-art has created an artform in boring videos of naked, lovely young girls. What a wasted effort.

The erotic and sensual value of most Met-art videos is close to zero.

12-21-10  03:16pm

Reply To Message

5

yote78 (5) As beautiful as the models are on MPL, MetArt and the like...and as as glamorously as they are shot, those sites are just too artsy for my taste. I'm not into really rough stuff but I do need more than just nudity, that is,some kind of sexual action, to differentiate between erotic photos/vids on a website and oil paintngs in a museum.
12-22-10  07:16am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.