| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
I am glad to hear that the site has improved. I thought it had potential.
|
12-05-10 09:46pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
messmer, if you are into lingerie, there is a site that might interest you.
Art-Lingerie
The models are teen/early 20s. Many of them very attractive/pretty.
I'm not a member, but I have seen a couple of photosets from the site.
The photos are not as good as what you get at met-art or mplstudios.
The poses are very similar/repetitive.
You get a series of photos of a girl who is almost entirely naked except for wearing nylons (and maybe a tiny brief/panties).
The monthly price is not bad: $19.95/month.
You don't get strip-tease or any kind of tease. Just a bunch of photos of a single girl who is wearing nylons.
If nylons (and a garter belt) are your thing, the site might have limited value.
But I thought the quality of the photos was slightly less than what you get at met-art and mplstudios.
And there is too much similarity in the poses. Which is boring.
Only if you really like nylons (and good-looking young women) would you like this site.
But I am glad you found a site you thoroughly enjoy, even if you could not give it the magic score of 100. :)
|
12-05-10 10:15pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
Hey. lk2fireone, thanks for the tip. I am not sure if a site that featured nylons and garter belt only would be more than of limited value to me. The thing I have against most sites is that the models get down to nude too quickly, which makes most of the set monotonous in my eyes. Even nylons and garter belt (and I love them) would become boring very quickly if that's all there was to a set. For me the excitement has always been in the gradual unveiling, like Salome, of Biblical times, with her seven veils. :-) This makes most pictures different from the ones before and the ones after and therefore the set is more exciting to me. In connection with this site I appreciate the fact that there are sets with drawn out strip sequences. The lingerie isn't always to my liking but I wouldn't punish a site for not having the vintage stuff I crave. I can't ignore the fact that times have moved on and that in some things I am being left behind.
|
12-06-10 08:05am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :
Hey, mbaya, if you read my previous review you will know that I always thought highly of this site because it was heads and shoulders above the only other hairy site I had subscribed to up till then. I, too, am happy that the webmaster tries so hard to please. It really shows. I am sure there will nevertheless be detractors but then you can't please everyone.
|
12-06-10 08:08am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Denner (0)
|
Another great messmer review - but I'll never be a (new) hairy fan: except from those vintage materials - in those times shaved pussies were not much in style - and the "natural" pussy was great - like some of those US models like Barbii, Stephanie Rage, Blondie, Racquel Darrian ect. Love that time...and keep material from then - though not the best quality, for sure - as a precious treasure.
But for newer porn it's 'shaved pussy' for this user - so one difference in taste there, messmer.....
|
12-07-10 08:30am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Denner :
Hey, Denner. Thanks for the positive comments re. the review. Hairy for me is not so much of a niche as part of a greater desire to see natural women. At least material that looks natural to someone over sixty. I don't like tattoos and piercings for the same reason. As to the shaved look, I must admit I am slowly getting used to it and no longer have much of a problem with it but if I have my choice, as I do with this site, I'll still go with hairy!
|
12-07-10 09:38am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Nice review, sir messmer....but then I wouldn't expect otherwise from one so accomplished at writing them.
I'm finding our porning taste and interest in stuff coming down the pike now-a-days are becoming somewhat more narrow..meaning we're agreeing more on "what's hot an' what's not."
I wouldn't classify "hairy" ,though, as making a dramatic comeback, but I'm pleased with the recent release of more and more showing up.
|
12-07-10 05:33pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - graymane :
Thanks, graymane! It would be strange if our tastes weren't similar in certain respects because I always maintain that our Porn likes and dislikes are formed during the years of our sexual awakening and both of us occupy the same decade! :-)
As to the dramatic come-back? I once again agree, the hairy niche may gain some converts now and then but I don't see a great ground swell of people who all of a sudden got tired of shaved! But that's alright, too. Live and let live. And as I said to Denner, I seem to be getting used to the "new" look! :-)
|
12-07-10 05:53pm
Reply To Message
|
