Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy (1)

Active
99
messmer (137) 12-05-10  04:11pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Friendly, involved and supportive Webmaster.
+Amazing models, amazing quality.
+Excellent growth since my last review. I counted 134 models today who, on the average, posed for seven to eight sets and videos. Not shabby for a site a year old. Growth has accelerated even more since Nov. 11, 2010, when the site decided on three updates a day, seven days a week.
+Now includes downloads for portables.
+All videos, except for a very few are of HD quality at 1280x720 at 5000 kbps. Videos are available in various formats, HD MP4, HD WMV, DVD MP4, DVD WMV plus iPOD/iPHONE MP4.
+Picture sets are available zipped in Standard Resolution (1024), High Resolution (1600) and Super High Resolution (3000+). Custom zip available.
+Excellent HD streaming of videos.
+Excellent search. Search by category or hone in on something that meets your taste exactly, it's all there.
+Allows you to filter out themes you don't care for, has a voting system, allows for comments good and bad, has a forum. Continued:
Cons: Super High Speed for me (anywhere from 2.5 MB/s to 3 MB/s.

*********************************************

Can't find one darn thing wrong with the site, except that | would like to see every model come wrapped in erotic lingerie but seeing that someone else expressed their distaste of all those lingerie sets in a comment .. we must give Kudos to the Webmaster for looking after his strange taste as well! :-) Just kidding, friend!
Bottom Line: I love this site. So far as I am concerned they started with the intention of making theirs the best hairy site possible and have added enough bells and whistles in the year they have been in existence that they achieved top dog position in this short time.

I would have given a hundred but I'm still smarting from that one non-confidence vote I got last time I gushed over a site. :-)

Highly recommended to all hairy fans. You are getting the best in the niche.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

mbaya (356) I am glad to hear that the site has improved. I thought it had potential.
12-05-10  09:46pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) messmer, if you are into lingerie, there is a site that might interest you.
Art-Lingerie
The models are teen/early 20s. Many of them very attractive/pretty.
I'm not a member, but I have seen a couple of photosets from the site.
The photos are not as good as what you get at met-art or mplstudios.
The poses are very similar/repetitive.
You get a series of photos of a girl who is almost entirely naked except for wearing nylons (and maybe a tiny brief/panties).
The monthly price is not bad: $19.95/month.
You don't get strip-tease or any kind of tease. Just a bunch of photos of a single girl who is wearing nylons.
If nylons (and a garter belt) are your thing, the site might have limited value.
But I thought the quality of the photos was slightly less than what you get at met-art and mplstudios.
And there is too much similarity in the poses. Which is boring.
Only if you really like nylons (and good-looking young women) would you like this site.

But I am glad you found a site you thoroughly enjoy, even if you could not give it the magic score of 100. :)

12-05-10  10:15pm

Reply To Message

3

messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Hey. lk2fireone, thanks for the tip. I am not sure if a site that featured nylons and garter belt only would be more than of limited value to me. The thing I have against most sites is that the models get down to nude too quickly, which makes most of the set monotonous in my eyes. Even nylons and garter belt (and I love them) would become boring very quickly if that's all there was to a set. For me the excitement has always been in the gradual unveiling, like Salome, of Biblical times, with her seven veils. :-) This makes most pictures different from the ones before and the ones after and therefore the set is more exciting to me. In connection with this site I appreciate the fact that there are sets with drawn out strip sequences. The lingerie isn't always to my liking but I wouldn't punish a site for not having the vintage stuff I crave. I can't ignore the fact that times have moved on and that in some things I am being left behind.
12-06-10  08:05am

Reply To Message

4

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

Hey, mbaya, if you read my previous review you will know that I always thought highly of this site because it was heads and shoulders above the only other hairy site I had subscribed to up till then. I, too, am happy that the webmaster tries so hard to please. It really shows. I am sure there will nevertheless be detractors but then you can't please everyone.
12-06-10  08:08am

Reply To Message

5

Denner (233) Another great messmer review - but I'll never be a (new) hairy fan: except from those vintage materials - in those times shaved pussies were not much in style - and the "natural" pussy was great - like some of those US models like Barbii, Stephanie Rage, Blondie, Racquel Darrian ect. Love that time...and keep material from then - though not the best quality, for sure - as a precious treasure.

But for newer porn it's 'shaved pussy' for this user - so one difference in taste there, messmer.....

12-07-10  08:30am

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - Denner :

Hey, Denner. Thanks for the positive comments re. the review. Hairy for me is not so much of a niche as part of a greater desire to see natural women. At least material that looks natural to someone over sixty. I don't like tattoos and piercings for the same reason. As to the shaved look, I must admit I am slowly getting used to it and no longer have much of a problem with it but if I have my choice, as I do with this site, I'll still go with hairy!
12-07-10  09:38am

Reply To Message

7

graymane (29) Nice review, sir messmer....but then I wouldn't expect otherwise from one so accomplished at writing them.
I'm finding our porning taste and interest in stuff coming down the pike now-a-days are becoming somewhat more narrow..meaning we're agreeing more on "what's hot an' what's not."
I wouldn't classify "hairy" ,though, as making a dramatic comeback, but I'm pleased with the recent release of more and more showing up.

12-07-10  05:33pm

Reply To Message

8

messmer (137) REPLY TO #7 - graymane :

Thanks, graymane! It would be strange if our tastes weren't similar in certain respects because I always maintain that our Porn likes and dislikes are formed during the years of our sexual awakening and both of us occupy the same decade! :-)

As to the dramatic come-back? I once again agree, the hairy niche may gain some converts now and then but I don't see a great ground swell of people who all of a sudden got tired of shaved! But that's alright, too. Live and let live. And as I said to Denner, I seem to be getting used to the "new" look! :-)

12-07-10  05:53pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.