Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit abbywinters

abbywinters (0)

dingle (1) 11-25-10  11:40am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)

Abby re-visited

After a long break from abby im back and that same old wasted monies feeling comes back.

Not alot has changed on the videos & photo shoots. The normal 19+ pages of photos and nothing until page 17 on some shoots.

The videos 25 mins maybe 3-5 mins of full nudity (Full nudity for me means seeing everything) I know this is "Un-scripted" but com'on at least tell your models to not cross their legs when blabbing on for 15 mins!!or hide behind curtains ect.
Im quite gutted as there is still some very nice models but the video format is still the same and a HUGE waste of 500mb+HQ/750+ HD per video.

Todays video "Kyle" made me write this c'mon abby folks 14mins and near end just a quick flash now and again (such a shame) but i cannot understand why so soft when she has done a intimate moments shoot???? This can also be said for some other shoots older ones are more nuddy and new one's like are like a free video that comes with your porno mag (Top shelf rated 18+)

I just dont under stand abby could be sooo much better & are missing a huge money market, I read somewhere on here or their forums "Alot of members join every now and again" Eh? you should be getting people hooked and paying each month.

Erm im trying to think of plus side... Ponders for 5 mins, oh yeah there is still quite a few hard core vid's dildo/fingering-but if your joining just for them i would look else where because not every update is like them.

The site has had a re-vamp and to be honest it much better and with search options and favorite options and links and HD- the photo sets really have a zing and load up quick.

Phew a big load off my chest, after seeing the reviews here and still the 85+ score im really not sure who is writing these reviews!!!
For me this is my VERY LAST vist to this site,and i will have a hunt around for a soft/amature site which SHOWS the pubic areas-such such a shame !!! And i shall not be fooled by the trailers again in the "Explore site" option..

Goodbye abby, my monies going else where......

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) Yes, I can understand your frustration.

I feel similarly about this site.

Cap'n. :0/

11-25-10  11:56am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) Gee... wasn't it about five months ago that we were told by site reps that they knew things needed shaking up - and that things were going to change? Seems my cynicism is justified more and more these days.

Thanks for the heads up, dingle. Sorry you took the hit - maybe you can just look at it as "taking one for the team".

11-25-10  06:50pm

Reply To Message


RustyJ (145) Very good comment! Longer and more informative than many reviews I've read!
11-25-10  10:15pm

Reply To Message


abbywinters (29)
REPLY TO #2 - RagingBuddhist :

Actually, since that five months ago, we have significantly "shaken things up", largely due to the feedback offered here on these forums (but also on our forums). The original poster, above, selected a shoot that was shot 1.5 years ago.

If you look at the more recently-shot shoots (some examples include kelly_r, masie, rachel_e, anna_l_2, elisabeta, nichole, and gretchen) you'll see we've changed a fair bit.

It's ok if YOU don't like the new shoots, or AW in general, or me, or the models, or whatever - this site is designed to let people air their views. But it's not cool to bitch about people DO like the site. They have an opinion, and it's just as valid as yours.

11-28-10  03:11am

Reply To Message


daniel bum (In-Active) REPLY TO #4 - abbywinters :

After they made all those changes the quality of the videos started going down. Unattracted girls with no lesbian sex skills nor personal charisma, plus poor camera work has contribuited for me to lose interest on this site. Why don't they bring back the "good girls" from the past, Chloe, Gabrielle, Nadine, Gisselle, Alex T, Katherine F, Kara D, Carly T, Jilly, Marigold, Carla, etc. Oh, those were the days !!! I think that Chloe should have her own section with videos only performed by her and any other girl, THAT alone would make me sign again. And for the love of God, get a decent camera operator, somebody able to capture something, some clean a clear oral sex for instances would be nice, don't you think. We'll see, I only hope this site gets in the right track again.
11-28-10  04:25pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.