My Precious Virgins Comment : Site needs some work

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Comment

A note about the site and any replies from other users.

My Precious Virgins (0)

bibo (13)	11-01-10 06:36am
	TRUST USER? YES (22), NO (0)

Site needs some work

This is a pretty good site with lots of high quality content. I joined the site because of the movies.
However, the navigation is quite uncomfortable and needs some work.

1. The picture and the movie part of the site are completely separated. If you look up a model on the picture site, you only get links to the photo shootings. There are no links to the movies of the model.

2. All movies are split up into 3-8 parts and you need to downlaod them separately.

3. All movies have the same filename (high01.wmv etc.), so you need to rename them!

4. Download speed seems to be capped at 2 MBit/s, you can download more than 1 file @ that speed though.

5. Some movies are tagged as HDV 1080 but are in fact only 1280x720 resolution.

6. The actual HDV 1080 movies are 1440x1080

7. The movie page does NOT have a page navigation (page 1 2 3 4 etc). You just have a next button and the back button of your browser.

Bottom line:
A solid site with good content but some inconvenient elements.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (3)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	Denner (233)	Thanks for head-ups here - been a member a couple of times - but loooong time ago! According to the latest PREVIEW there certainly is NOT much updates in vids here - and what I can see from that preview all material is still licensed - and can be found elsewhere... Once (also some time ago) the Drooler mentioned that this site primarily is for pix sets - guess it's still the case? Do you plan a review? - if so - look forward to it...	11-01-10 07:30am Reply To Message
2	bibo (13)	REPLY TO #1 - Denner : According to the update history, the last movie was added in February 2010 and the last picture set was added in June 2010. They seem to have pretty big gaps in between their updates from time to time. Yes, it´s definitely more a photography site than a movie site. I`m not a big fan of picture sets, but to be honest, I´ve seen better quality on other sites. Images are often photoshopped (which is a no-go for me) and some sets are lacking variety. After surfing the site for a couple of hours, I spotted a few more glitches and bugs. No big deal, but annoying and it confirms my initial statement, that this site needs a rework. It´s just sloppy and poorly coded. As for the review, I never wrote a review and I don´t know if can be bothered. I think my comment contains all the crucial points, so people can form their own opinion without my score.	11-01-10 11:45am Reply To Message
3	tangub (151)	REPLY TO #2 - bibo : Thanks for the info, what you've provided in the comment and reply here could easily have been put in to a review without much extra effort...those are the facts most of us want to know re updates, picture, movie quality etc.	11-02-10 03:48am Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.