Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Errotica Archives

Errotica Archives (0)

graymane (33) 10-18-10  08:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + No technical or login problems.
+ exceptionally good quality HD pics and videos.
+ Zip files.
+ Ample number beautiful models.
+ Frequent updates.
+ Picture images are done well, with multiple frames and poses.
Cons: + My major compliant is this site is chiefly a nude photo shoot. Models do very little except smile.
Videos, although sexy, are mostly rapid-fire takes of subjects who are too often changing positions. There are also too few videos for the number of models on hand.
Although most media formats were availsble, I found them complicated and download speed to be agonizingly slow. Hardcore is non-existent, as well as a dire shortage of erotic behavier.
Bottom Line: I was given a combo, Met Art and this site for supposedly a discount. However, $29.95 is still too much. I'm getting woefully little I wanted or expected from this deal. For those who fancy superb photography and video of sexy ladies... then this is their bag. But I wouldn't recommend it to guys who want to get a rise out of what they're looking at --- So with that in mind, I wouldn't bother to unzip my fly.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


lk2fireone (196) Sorry you were disappointed, graymane. You did get a nice price at $29.95 for two major softcore sites. Unfortunately, Metart is famous for its non-erotic videos of lovely young models.

From what you write, it sounds like you should avoid softcore sites, and look for something harder. Most softcore sites, like Femjoy, MPL Studios, etc. would probably be too soft for you.

There are plenty of sites out there. The problem is finding the ones that appeal to your personal tastes, at a reasonable price.

There's also a ton of crap out there. Metart and Errotica Archives are quality sites, they just don't meet your tastes.

10-18-10  09:09pm

Reply To Message


graymane (33) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

You're probably right, 1k, I guess I was a little hard on the site (pun intended).
And in retrospect, having it to do over I would give them a better grade. It is indeed a beautiful site, it's just I kept stumbling over obstacles that thwarted my expections. I've visited the site less than a dozen times, so inasmuch my month is almost up, that should yield some indication of my interest.
Contrarily, I do favor softcore...it's just I want it to do something for me. If you've read my threads you'll get a good idea of what I like and don't like.....and again, you must've read me wrong or I likely laid things out in a way I prefer hardcore...actually nothing could be further from the truth. I like it in moderation, and if it's done with style and a little class. But we both know scarce that is, don't we.
Thanks, 1k, for taking the time to comment. I appreciate it.

10-18-10  09:58pm

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #2 - graymane :

That's what we all want, a site "to do something for me". But as we get older, that changes. When I was an early teen, looking at a copy of the Sears catalog (the women's swimwear or lingerie sections) would do it for me. But now I can look at a catalog of Victoria's Secret, which is far more colorful and explicit than what I ever saw in the Sears catalog, and
Victoria's Secret is just a catalog, even though it has beautiful women in lovely lingerie.

I used to be exclusively softcore. Then I joined PU, and I've been getting into hardcore. I'm still mainly softcore, but I'm looking for new material and new sites that I hope I will find entertaining. Most of what I find doesn't really appeal to me. But I keep searching. Because there is a lot of good content out there, somewhere. :)

As far as your score for this site, that's an entirely personal opinion. I used to worry when I gave a site a score whether it was the "right" score. But then I finally realized that a site score is very subjective. Some people think a site's score is based on objective factors, and they even have a rigorous system to create a score based on specific factors. But I personally believe a score is both subjective and objective, as long as the basic factors of download speed, ease of navigation, basic quality of contents, basic amount of contents are at the site. And each person's standards of acceptable varies, as does the person's tastes and opinions.

10-18-10  10:44pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

A very lucid assesment.

Worthy of being the start of a thread in the forum, I reckon! ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

10-19-10  09:45am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) Looking in the tour area, it does look to be good quality photography.

Do they ever break out of the cliched nude glamour shoot approach though?

Cap'n. :0/

10-19-10  09:51am

Reply To Message


graymane (33) REPLY TO #5 - Capn :

I probably was a little too brutal with my review....I went in unprepared, so it's my own fault and frankly should'nt of come down on the site as I did. They're very good at what they DO --unfortunately it doesn't DO it for me.
Thanks for your thoughts.

10-19-10  10:19am

Reply To Message


tangub (155) REPLY TO #6 - graymane :

Sorry to hear you were disappointed with this site. I was there 2 or 3 years ago and still rate it as one of my favorite sites.
10-22-10  03:31am

Reply To Message


graymane (33) REPLY TO #7 - tangub :

I'm not too much disappointed choosing the site as I am not getting what I expected. I have to blame myself for not doing more research, and should have stressed that more firmly in the review. It's indeed a beautiful site and seemingly lives up to it's reputation.
Thanks for your input.

10-22-10  01:15pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.