Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy (1)

messmer (137) 10-18-10  07:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-28-10  07:49pm  (Update History)
Reason: Nope, just couldn't leave the score at 80. I tried to be objective but over 10 days with 8 picture updates a day I have downloaded ONE picture set!
Pros: Huge number of models and pictures.

Picture (around 1600x1065px) files can now be downloaded in one zip file.

Large daily updates.

Fast downloads for me.

Good search engine that really allows you to narrow down your choices.
Cons: I complained about this in my last review: Too little imagination shown by many photographers.

One of them uses the same dress and underwear on too many models. One striped dress in particular should be retired for good because I've seen it on at least four different models over the years.

Greater attention should be shown to the temperature of a picture set. Some are way too warm (too much color, too much of a yellowish, orange tinge).

Quality of models seems to be deteriorating with too many heavily tattooed and pierced ladies on the pay roll. Introduction of hardcore material has not done the site any good either. This was not taken into consideration when scoring because many like hardcore and consider this a plus.

I still don't like the present set-up when it comes to up-dates. To a newcomer it must be very confusing to see previous updates in numbered "volumes."

Videos have improved SOME (854x480px, 2149 TB) but still fall short in days where HD has become standard
Bottom Line: I adjusted my score upward from the 75 I gave this site in my last review because I have already found some quite well done sets of beautiful hairy ladies in my first few days back with this site and with the large daily updates I expect to see enough worthwhile material to make my month's subscription a good deal.

Nov. 13, 2010:

However, now I am forced to downgrade even more because the quality of the updates is truly appalling. The models are lacking, with too many sporting tattoos, piercings, scars etc., the photography, as mentioned above, is consistently dull.

My take is that ATK Natural and Hairy is on its way out and is making a last ditch effort to keep or build its subscriber base by throwing 8 picture updates plus two videos a day at the consumer. This will be fine, of course, by those who like to rip a site but to the discriminating collector the present ATK is a disaster.

Just to show I am not being too subjective: I just counted the past thirteen updates containing 104 picture sets and only five of them were voted as "hot" by the subscribers!

Folks are fed up and it's obvious by the score they give the sets.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (10)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) I rejoined recently myself because I got a good promo offer.

Whilst I am pleased I did, I still think user selected zips are required.
Some sets have as many as 250 pics in, telling a story that could easliy be told in 100pics or a bit less.
These sets feature a lot of duplication of poses so could be regarded as padding.

I have started pruning after download, but I find it a PITA!

Cap'n. :0/

10-19-10  09:58am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

I know that you have been waiting for a user selected zip option, Cap'n. I think we've talked about this before but with Windows 7 I simply extract the contents of the zip file, change view to large icons and eliminate all the pictures I don't want, so it basically amounts to the same thing. Come to think of it, seeing that I have the Pro version of Winzip, I only have to open the file and delete one by one the superfluous pictures. The icons are large enough that the details of a picture can be clearly made out. It might be worthwhile looking into investing in Winzip Pro because, as you know to your frustration, most sites don't offer the option you are waiting for.
10-19-10  11:22am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Yes, I am using similar software.

I would just rather not download 100MB & have to delete 80MB of it.

Cap'n. :0/

10-19-10  11:43am

Reply To Message


graymane (33) As usual, a very comprehensive and informing review, messmer. I've been contemplating joining something, anything that'll bring back some hair. I'll give this one serious consideration when making a decision.
10-20-10  10:43pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #4 - graymane :

It is a pretty good option.

WeAreHairy is worth a look too.

Cap'n. :0)

10-21-10  03:03pm

Reply To Message


tangub (155) Thanks for the review. good to read the photo sets come in one zip now, last time i was at any of the ATK sites it was 20 pics per zip and so time consuming to unpack them all and move to one folder.
10-22-10  03:34am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #6 - tangub :

I know what you mean! I've subscribed to this site quite a few times in the past and it was a nuisance to zip each individual page in a set. :-)
10-22-10  10:04am

Reply To Message


Ray O (3) Good review. I agree with most of your points. I was a long-time subscriber to ATK N&H - over ten years consecutive. In fact, I gave them an outstanding review only a year or two ago.

I quit in 2010, probably for good. They really made a lot of changes to the way they operate, and almost all of them degraded the site.

1) Too many repeats of the same models
2) A reduction of their stable of photographers. They have only about two left that are any good.
3) Hardcore porn videos. SLick, over-produced sets and format.
4) Using pro porn stars. They are fake in every way except no silicone.
5) Not really trying to find real amateurs and natural GND gals and not willing to pay to get them.

There is more, but do you really care? They basically drove me away - I guess in favor of some other type of customer. I bet they will be out of business in a year or two.

01-02-11  08:32am

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #8 - Ray O :

I basically agree with all the points you make regarding this site. It is really too bad because it was one of a small handful I revisited over and over.

As to your last paragraph, I was sure they would go under but it seems there are enough Porn users out there who prefer quantity to quality, but the sad thing is that I no longer care after watching disappointing updates, day after day. I finally decided, no more. So they definitely will no longer exist for users like you and me.

01-02-11  10:15am

Reply To Message


hairyporn (0) REPLY TO #8 - Ray O :

I also a agree with all of your points, I have recently cancelled my subscription because of the points that you have listed above. Unfortunately they have lost a lot of good photographers and not replaced them.
There is also a lack of new models coming on to the site.
The number of pictures in some sets are way too high I don't like trawling through hundreds of photos in the same set.
For some reason which I can't quite place the girls no longer look natural!
Another downside I have found is that the site is blocking download managers

01-03-11  08:57am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.