Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X (1)

Active
82
slutty (111) 10-07-10  09:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Many attractive mostly euro young ladies
-Good sized site: 356 hardcore scenes (plus an additional 103 "beahind the scenes" hardcore sets), 1160 total castings.
-Good forum, webmaster is actually pretty active and answers questions from users
-newer movie quality is good from a technical standpoint - 1280x720 2500 kbps was the best I saw
-zip downloads of photosets, although there aren't a ton of photos
-download managers work
-no DRM
Cons: -large watermark on videos
-expensive
-no bonus content aside from access to some of the casting DVDs
-download speeds are inconsistent, best I got was 500 KB/sec
-some models don't get naked for very long, a few don't get naked at all
-poor navigation, although I am not sure how it could be easily improved on a site like this
-photo quality is mediocre, and only about 10% of the castings have photosets
-uses a biller I am not familiar with
-some content is available elsewhere
Bottom Line: Overall this site is pretty good and I'd recommend joining if you are a fan of casting syle videos. However, bear in mind that a lot of these videos are 90% chit-chat, 10% nudity. Some of them have sex in the casting, but the camerawork in these is pretty poor (single camera on a tripod).

His update schedule seems pretty regular, although I am not sure how long he holds onto some of these scenes before releasing them. He has a recent update of an Evelyn/Faith scene, that I would assume is several years old - although can't be sure.

The forum is quite interesting, and I believe you can access it for free. It is often curious what he says about a given model - although the forum is bilingual, with some comments in french and some in english. Either way, rare interaction you don't really see from most sites.

Overall I think this site is pretty good, Woodman definitely has a talent for getting very attractive ladies to take their clothes off - and for some to do hardcore. However, if you are not a fan of casting style videos, or are searching for particularly erotic scenes, this probably isn't the site for you.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) Nice review, but I get the impression that you scored the site higher than you actually enjoyed the site contents. Or maybe you are trying to become a professional reviewer and giving an "objective" score/rating instead of one based on what you feel. Or maybe I've read too many reviews lately, and need to take a break. :)
10-07-10  09:42pm

Reply To Message

2

slutty (111) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

Hey man, a site like this is kind of difficult to review. On one hand they have some excellent content, but then there are other scenes that are pretty big "misses". I am personally a fan of castings with interviews and stuff before the model gets naked, so that is probably why I scored the site so high even though the content is pretty variable. He definitely gets some attractive models, it is just too bad that a lot of the hardcore castings are single-camera on a tripod type deals, although that it pretty much what I expected.
10-07-10  11:08pm

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #2 - slutty :

Slutty, I thought your review was good, I was not trying to criticize it in any way. Please understand that. It's just that I thought you would be more enthusiastic or satisfied with the site when you gave it a score of 82. We seem to have similar tastes, because I have enjoyed many of the sites you have reviewed, and I thought your scores for those sites I knew about were close to what I would have scored them.

So I am not quibbling with your score. I just thought you didn't personally enjoy the site very much. But I was just trying to read more into your review than what you wrote.

But like you say, there are good and bad points to the site, and how much you enjoy it is a personal matter. Even though we are writing a review that is supposed to be a guide for others.

I keep flipping from one side to the other, which can be annoying. LOL. I keep saying the same thing in my own reviews, that "how much you enjoy a site depends on your personal reaction to the contents, and not just the contents themselves".

10-08-10  04:41am

Reply To Message

4

slutty (111) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

yeah looking back at my review it does seem a bit negative given the score, I was mainly trying to point out all the flaws, as this place certainly has its problems.

I did enjoy the site, there were just many scenes where after it downloaded I looked at it and was like, what the fuck is this? I guess I am just willing to overlook the bad for the good in this case...

10-08-10  11:57pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.