DDF Network (3)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||-High quality video on all but the oldest scenes. Some are offered up to 1080p but I'm unsure whether they really are worth the extra file size when comparing to 720p.
-Excellent quality of photography and high quality pictures. Should be enough for anybody but the 30" display users.
-Top class models if you like European looking girls without bolt on tits, too many tattoos or piercings. I know I do. Maybe a bit heavy on makeup side but that's up to everyone's personal taste.
-House of Taboo. My issue with most networks is that they don't really offer a decent fetish site. Well, DDF does!
-Lots and lots of old stuff to go through.
-Cherry Jul seems to be receiveing updates again although I thought of it as a dead archive site when considering subscription. Updates cannot be properly browsed on the subsite however but they can be all found on main site.
||-Not many updates include actual boy/girl hardcore sex. Emphasis seems to be on girl/girl, solo and niche stuff (HotLegsAndFeet, DDFBusty, OnlyBlowjob)
-Quite a lot of shared material between sites. Wouldn't hurt at all if the file naming was uniform across sites but it isn't. Some duplicate downloading results which is fortunately only a minor nuisance.
-Too fancy login system. Prevents logging in using Playstation 3 browser although the console seems to support the streaming video clips. I hope either the site login or the PS3 browser receives an upgrade in near future. It's my main media player.
-Some older House of Taboo stuff seems to be removed. There are references to certain actresses and their scenes that cannot be found (Violet Blue, one of my favorites among them)
-Some older clips seem to be resampled from lower quality material. This is somewhat pointless as most of the TV's, projectors and PC's can do it on the fly and reduce the file size. Just mention the real size!
||All in all a very nice site with lots of high quality content. Not the cheapest one around but certainly not expensive either. I almost feel that those sub 100$ a year networks with 30+ sub sites are selling themselves too cheap. With a cost of a BluRay movie you can freely download HD content for months.
My suggestion would be for them to develop more the main site and it's features and eventually ditch the subsites or maybe just leave them as archives. With pricings that networks have these days, I doubt they have many single site subsriptions left. Better if everything was put on main site, under different categories with no duplicates.
Oh, bigger pictures never hurt and they don't take too much space anyway. When I said they are large enough for a 24" screen, I know if I update to 30" screen I'll be thinking they coulde be even larger!
Reply To Review