Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings (3)

Active
86
slutty (111) 07-21-10  01:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Vast amount of content
-Regular updates on most of the main sites
-Download managers work, I tried DTA and GetRight
-Decent download speeds, I averaged about 800 KB/sec
-Good price for the amount of content you get
-Excellent variety, pretty much everything is here except hard fetishes
-No DRM
-Zip Downloads of photosets
-MP4 and WMV video quality were good, but not great, both at 768x432 1500 kbps. I thought the MP4 looked better, but neither were super crisp at full screen.
-In-browser video player is pretty good, can seek easily without excessive buffering.
Cons: -I find there to be a few too many ads, ads when you login, pop-ups
-Website can be glitchy, In The VIP has been disabled for video downloads for almost a week.
-Older content often in three parts still
-Navigation could use some improvement, sorting is a bit odd.
-A bit heavy on the large breasted women for my tastes, but there is plenty for anyone
-They advertise it as HD, but this is only available in streaming format. I would say the streamed HD content is mediocre as far as HD material I have seen (not sure how to check the specs on this).
Bottom Line: I think this site is pretty excellent, although to me not quite the best out there - as they advertise. There is a wide variety of content, although the primary focus of most of the sites is hardcore material of some sort. If you are looking for solo material, this isn't the place to look.

I do enjoy that the site has model interviews, and other such activities instead of jumping straight to the action. I see this type of thing as a positive, I suppose others might not like this, or consider it a waste of HD space and download time.

To me this site appears to be another site that is focussing a bit too much on quantity over quality. Compared to the last time I was a full-access member here a couple of years ago, I found that a lot of their newer content was not up to the quality standards of previous years.

The other main drawbacks to this site are the sites general practices. Advertising on the homepage that video is in HD, but not allowing people to download said video is a bit iffy in my opinion. Also, excessive advertising, and pop-ups are a bit much. I often get a popup to that fling.com place when I go straight to the member page.

All in all, a pretty decent site if you are into hardcore material. If you are looking for downloadable HD content or solo material I would probably look elsewhere. If the site could improve the quality of some of the recent material as well as improve some of the navigation/site issues, it could in fact be the best porn site on the net.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

mbaya (356) I also basically liked the site. I found the models to be a bit too slick and overly made up, in other words very much the stereotypical pornstar look. The site itself I thought was also a bit overdone and slick. If I had to pick a single word to describe the women and the site it would be plastic. Yet, a lot of the videos are interesting and grabbed my attention.
07-21-10  05:49pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) I read only yesterday that Reality Kings are being sued over copyright infringement when it comes to the music on some videos. The VIP especially was mentioned, with Reality King's lawyers arguing that they could hardly record a party without recording the background music that goes with it at the same time. I have a feeling that's where your glitch comes in. Everyone is being cautious till the whole matter of infringement becomes a bit clearer.

And thanks for a great and thorough review. I was more impressed with their mp4 files than you (see my comment) but otherwise don't see anything in your comments to argue about! :-)

07-21-10  06:42pm

Reply To Message

3

247skizia (5) Great review, I'm saddened by the fact that the HD content is streaming only. I tend to like to save clips to my hard drive to watch later.
07-21-10  07:48pm

Reply To Message

4

slutty (111) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Ah, perhaps that is why it is down. It all makes sense to me now, that updating music site message totally confused me...

I think the mp4 files are decent quality, but they don't look great full screen. I mainly put that in the review so people knew if they joined, they weren't getting the best quality video.

07-21-10  08:25pm

Reply To Message

5

slutty (111) REPLY TO #3 - 247skizia :

Yeah, I think most of us do, and I think if they are going to advertise having HD they should note somewhere on the join page that it is streaming only - for those of us that don't frequent PU.
07-21-10  08:27pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.