Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Beshine

Beshine (0)

BadMrFrosty (56) 06-01-10  03:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very nice technical video quality 1080P WMV @ 8Mbits / Sec.

"Iphone" quality video 320 * 180 MP4 AVC @ ~1Mbit Sec.

50 videos with matching photo sets.

16 diary entries with photo sets.

Good members forum where Beshine takes an active role.

I love the design of the site, very elegant and intuitive. A lot of "big" sites could learn some lessons here.

No DRM, no download limits, no regional pricing, multiple payment processors including CCbill.
Cons: Expensive at $30 per month.

The video encoding profile used is NOT DXVA compliant meaning you will need a beefy CPU to decode the 1080P video without frame drops.

Photo sets contain on average only 50 photos.

Photo sets are not zipped.

Videos are on average only 3 minutes long.

Photos and video very amateur.

REALLY lacking in variety of the content.

Very, very, very soft-core. Topless only.
Bottom Line: Karasek did a good job with his review so I was in 2 minds about posting this. While I am of pretty much the same opinion as him, I believe my review adds some worthwhile details so I decided to post it.

The 2 things that really bring the score down are the variety of the content and the ability of the photographer.

80% of the videos / photosets just start with Beshine wearing a certain piece of tight clothing while pottering around outside. If it wasn't for the couple of topless shots at the end of each set I would think I was looking at someone's holiday snaps. The variety in the later updates seems to have improved a lot, hopefully it will stay that way.

Adding to the holiday snap feel, the photos are very badly framed and some of the outdoor scenes are majorly underexposed. They are better in some of the later updates, maybe the photographer/cameraman has just been on a course.

There are a lot of things to like here if you are into freakishly large tities. Even in the short time the site has been live it is possible to see the size of those boobs grow from "back breakingly large" to "so big they are visible from space". If it appeals to follow a girl on her quest to have the largest breasts in the world then it is worth joining for that alone. My 2 main issues with the content itself seems to have improved in the later updates, I think once she has found her feet this could be a must for big boob lovers.

I really don't see the content getting more hardcore, she doesn't seem to be that type of gal. As I'm usually into harder stuff my final score reflects this. If you are into soft-core, it would be fair to add 5 points to the score.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


ace of aces (179) bad luck taht you joined that site before Karasek (8) maked his review, or was it curiosity?
06-02-10  10:19am

Reply To Message


BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #1 - ace of aces :

I actually joined just before his review but I would not call it bad luck. Despite its faults I actually really like this site, it has a certain charm that a lot of sites dont have. Its hard to describe but some places, despite having great content, feel kind of barren, empty and souless; something I did not find here. In my review I tried to be objective which is why the score is low, I couldnt in good conscience give it a higher score when it had so many obvious faults. Those faults are slowly being improved so I will be updating the review in the future to reflect any changes.
06-02-10  11:19am

Reply To Message


ace of aces (179) REPLY TO #2 - BadMrFrosty :

agree with you.
06-23-10  02:41am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.