Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (1)

turboshaft (24) 04-05-10  12:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 250+ smiling, skinny, shaved, super-hot hot models
+ Still almost purely solo- or girl-girl action that stays pretty entertaining
+ Amazing quality:
videos: HD up to 1920x1080 @ 300 kb/s
photos: hi-res are roughly 3900x2600px
+ Great quantity too; archived vids back to Apr 2007, photos much farther back
+ Daily video updates, new photo set released every two days
+ Download speeds have a lot of ass; I normally got about 1.3MB/s with a DL manager
+ They donate some of their pervy profits to charity, in case philanthropy is a deciding factor
Cons: - Large percentage of videos are just BTS, and with photo sets the BTS is usually just mixed in
- Some models' content takes a long time to get released or simply stays unreleased
- Site design works well for what it is, but still has NO search function
- They are beginning to delve into boy-girl content, even if only lightly (read more in BL)
- Despite the fun some content can get predictable and routine
- 2 years since my first review and I still wish they would shoot more American girls or non-Euro girls
- I don't get to meet these girls in person! :-(
Bottom Line: What can I say that hasn't already been said so many times and so well about one of my all time favorite adult sites over the years--hell, over the history of much of the crazy web itself, seeing how these guys have been finding and shooting hot shaved ladies since 1996. And since they have been doing this for so long they know a thing or two about getting the goods; great photo and video quality, lots of content, fast access, and above all some very happy models, many of whom come back wanting more.

That last point, happy models who become 'repeat offenders' shall we say, is not something I take lightly when I am looking for a new site to join and it's something where ALS has never faltered. I may be in the minority when I say this, but I genuinely don't enjoy porn where the performers, know matter how willing, are abused, beaten up, disrespected, or at the end of the day just left dissatisfied and unhappy. Of course ALS being in the girls only genre probably helps keep things in check but it, like the majority of sites, is still owned and run by a male and caters to a primarily male audience.

And despite all of this male input the output for many years was totally female; female models with female assistants in most cases and a female co-performer or two in some others. But in the past few years they have, if ever so slightly, started to also use male assistants, or at least made them more visible in both photos and videos--not my cup of tea, thank you very much. Even more alarming--or simply the next logical step, depending on your view--they have just recently shot an actual boy-girl scene. It's yet to be released and is described as a blowjob scene with swallowing, but time will tell as to where ALS steers its content.

Generally speaking, and if you're not looking for hardcore content, there's a lot to love here and at least a little to hate. So take your pick; young, skinny, shaved, mostly white models who are not too shy, so don't be surprised by a single model performing many if not all of the following; peeing, fisting, speculum and other crazy insertions, anal, and near constant spreading. The site design may not be impressive to many, nor may be the large amount of BTS, but don't let it fool you--as girls-only content goes they do not disappoint.

I do wish they would be more consistent in releases though. They still have a habit of letting members vote on models' scenes to determine release order and this can mean months before a model's whole shoot is available, and some just never gets released at all. I guess this is a good thing--so much content that there's not enough time to release it all--but I would like to see it eventually. And as unique as some of their content is it can get predictably routine; toy A into slot b, and so on.

But damn if they don't make it look hot time and time again with each new model they find and corrupt. All these years and I'm still sold! :-P

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


MargulisAZ (84) Turboshaft you sure love this site, lol. Hats off to you friend, good review. My interest has come back over the last few months since a lot of the newer models are getting fisted again.
04-05-10  06:04pm

Reply To Message


turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #1 - MargulisAZ :

Yeah, I guess I do...but we all have to love something, don't we? ;-)

Though it has been two years since I last reviewed them, over a year since I was a 'regular' member (I rejoined for the first time in a long while last month), and my newer score is lower than before. I miss the way they were a few years ago but I think they still kick ass for dude-free material.

04-06-10  12:39am

Reply To Message


PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #2 - turboshaft :

Though the dude-free label is soon to go away, since they already announced that they'll be releasing a bj vid of Amy Brooke with some guy - then there was the Tanner Mayes Club Sandy BTS shoot, which was extensively boy/girl
04-06-10  06:57am

Reply To Message


turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #3 - PinkPanther :

Yeah, I made a comment about it a few weeks ago. Sadly but surely they look to be going that way. :-(
04-06-10  07:06pm

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) turboshaft - just a quick question about ALS Scan:

Based on your review of ALS Scan and a look at the little bit offered as a preview on the site I am thinking of taking a membership. I'm normally more into hardcore sites, though some of the solo and girl/girl sites I've had memberships to I quite liked. One thing I noted on the website is that they say there is some public nudity there. Apart from hardcore, public nudity is probably my second biggest interest. In your experience, is there much public nudity on the site or is it few and far between? I took a membership to FTV Girls a while back based on the possibility of some public nudity and I was really impressed. I know that FTV Girls isn't a public nudity site, but I think the webmaster could be missing out on a potential market for those of us who like that. It turned out to be an excellent site overall, and excellent for public stuff too. So is there any detail or advice on public nudity at ALS Scan you can offer? Would that apply to their sister site (ALS Angels) too?

Thanks for any advice you can provide.

04-14-10  01:59pm

Reply To Message


turboshaft (24) REPLY TO #5 - rearadmiral :

Sorry I didn't respond earlier, rearadmiral.

I'm not a fan of public nudity--I feel it's too Jackassesque to be erotic--but it is there, even if not as the main attraction, which is shaved ladies in privates places showing off their private places. ;-) Anyway, they generally seem to relegate the public nudity to bonus scenes, with a half hour or more (sometimes up to an hour) of video, with at least a hundred photos, again usually more, which I guess if you like public nudity are pretty good bonuses. I think the majority of the these full public nudity scenes are from Eastern Europe since doing it in the U.S. would be a crime against humanity or something, but they do occasional flashing in their American outdoor shoots, but not full-on public nudity for the entire scene.

They also have their annual Caribbean trip where they devote a day to going to the beach and shooting the girls pretty freely, that is on a nude public beach, with a lot of photos and video. I like these a little more than the traditional public nudity because they can be more exciting and open.

Hope this helps, maybe some other members will respond if they're currently subscribing.

04-22-10  01:08am

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) REPLY TO #6 - turboshaft :

I went ahead and took a membership (and added ALS Angels for $9.95) and I'm pretty impressed. You're right that public nudity isn't all that common but there is some. For what little is there I think it is still a decent value because the quality is so good. I think that part of my appreciation of the site is that it feature almost exclusively young, petite women. I'll let the rest of the PU gang in on more details once I've had some time to look around a bit more.

Thanks for replying.

04-22-10  05:03pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.