Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teen Pink Videos

Teen Pink Videos (0)

Active
81
slutty (111) 03-30-10  07:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very attractive, mostly euro models
-Good video quality 720x480 2500 kbps on most older material, 1024x576 4000 kbps on newer stuff
-No DRM
-Videos downloadable in parts or full scene
-Good mix of content: hardcore, "midcore", some lesbian, and some softcore
-Download managers work (at least for videos)
-Reasonably priced
-Okay photo quality, newer stuff is 1350x900
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent sized site, about 400 models
-Site seems primarily focused on videos now
-I think most content is exclusive
-Good download speeds, maxed my 7Mbps connection when using a download manager
Cons: -No bonus content
-Poor navigation, although the site says it is version 2.0, I don't see any significant improvements from a few years ago
-No search function
-No forum, model information, or anything of that nature
-When you go to cancel you are given links to Epoch and CCbill, however I was billed through DHD media, and a link is not provided.
-Inconsitent updates, don't appear to be on a schedule, seems like 2 videos and 2 photo sets per week
-Couldn't get download managers to work for zipped photosets (although this might just be me, as I've had this problem elsewhere)
-Videos and photos are watermarked, although not terribly annoying
Bottom Line: This site used to be one of my favorites, as it had great content from models like Belicia, Sonia Red, and Eufrat when they were younger.

However, the newer content certainly is not nearly as high quality (from model attractiveness perspective) as the older stuff in my opinion.

This day in age, most people expect some type of search function. Although they do have a model list, that is pretty much it as far as useful navigation tools. The Most Popular tab is somewhat useful, although most of the Most Popular material is older.

This site could definitely use a re-design, and work on getting models and content that meets the quality of their older material.

I didn't have any experience with customer service, although I would assume it would be pretty much the same as Twisty's.

This site is definitely worth joining if you have never been a member, however if you have been a member recently, it is probably not the best use of your money.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Cybertoad (Disabled) Nice review
04-02-10  07:31am

Reply To Message

2

Goldfish (67) I don't think the newer stuff is great quality technically either. Some of it is near-HD but about half of it is lower quality. Makes me wonder if they are re-posting older content or maybe publishing non-exclusive content.
04-04-10  07:23pm

Reply To Message

3

slutty (111) REPLY TO #2 - Goldfish :

I agree Goldfish, of the newer stuff I downloaded, some of it is pretty decent quality although nothing I downloaded was full HD. I think that the material that is lesser quality is either re-post (although I can't recall having seen it ever) or content they made a long time ago that never got posted. I haven't seen any of their material anywhere else, although that by no means shows that it is exclusive. I still think it is a pretty good site, and at least they have not gone more in the direction of their sister-site Twistys.
04-04-10  09:30pm

Reply To Message

4

slutty (111) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

Thanks man, I've been trying to incorporate as much of the recommendations from the forum as I can...
04-04-10  09:31pm

Reply To Message

5

Goldfish (67) REPLY TO #3 - slutty :

I had a similar experience. I can't say I've seen the content elsewhere but there must be some reason for the varying quality. Maybe they use different sources for their movies?
04-05-10  07:22pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.