Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (1)

adrenalinrush (5) 12-08-09  03:17pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)

Worth 90 in the 1990s

MA is the most overvalued page on TBP ever!
A shitload of naked girls might be a reason to join but they should start to rebuild their technical concepts and design. The browsing experience is equally boring as the sets they offer!

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (4)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) I remember the '90's. I even have an old, faded copy of the Whole Internet User's Guide & Catalogue, published in '92.

Exaggeration does not lend itself to credibility.

12-08-09  07:08pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Well, well, well: 'A shitload of naked girls' a bit heavy there...
MetArt MAY be a bit overrated in score at TBP in some ways - but it's still a site who comes up with great amounts of entirely exclusive photosets of great - mostly great - euro/easteuro girls - you cannot take that away from them - og what are we here for - but 'naked girls'....ect.
Always had the main complaint: boring videos - but that's almost a historic fact - so skip those as a reason to join.

12-09-09  08:28am

Reply To Message


propaGhandi (5) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

Yes, 'A shitload of naked girls' is a bit heavy there ...
But MetArt is definately overrated in score at TBP and adrenalinrush is right - sets and videos are really boring here.

12-09-09  01:59pm

Reply To Message


adrenalinrush (5) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

I've just joined MET (1 month only and it will be my last one forever!) because of this discussion.

Ok, naked girls might be a reason to join the site BUT after all MET does not stand the standards of today!

Compared to other sites the images are always mid or just low resolution, you can kick 3/5 of there archive because the images often over-sharpened, blurry or just plain boring.

In the galleries the browsing experience sucks. It's like the Ugh-factor is hitting me like a stone. Who the hell is still using the popup feature from the Stone Age? I don't want to use my browser's back button over and over again anymore.

MET finally has 3-5 top photographers that kept my head up but that's it :/

And something I nearly forgot, I never felt to be welcome in the memberzone. It's plain black and dreary and has additional promotion of other sites and that's something I can't accept as a paying customer!

12-13-09  12:00pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.