Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings (2)

morgentau (12) 08-22-09  04:18pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + thousands of hardcore scenes
+ many scenes with hot and enthusiastic girls
+ some of their sites have interesting and original concepts
+ fun niche content that is still mainstream-compatible
+ good amount of US, Latina and European content
+ good value if you join with one of the many discount offers
+ search across all sites
+ easy to navigate
+ fast download speeds (I could max out my 6Mbit connection downloading from Germany)
+ same price for European customers
Cons: - videos only have average video quality (720 x 480 px)
- older scenes have low video quality (480 x 320 px)
- pictures have low resolution (640 to 900 pixels on the long end)
- older scenes are split into multiple parts
- quite a bit of repetitive content
- some (few) of their sites could be named "generic porn site no 0815"
- false advertising for HD content
- sites could use some descriptions or introductions
- advertisements for third party content inside the members area
- download links time out after a while making it futile to use download managers

Bottom Line:

Realitykings is one of the largest providers of exclusive porn on the internet. While they only release two or three updates a day, their backlog has reached a size of >5000 scenes. The site tries to explore a variety of niches and fantasies while staying smack in the middle of mainstream pornography. The various sites act more like subcategories, so you only have one login and one site layout to deal with.
Bottom Line: Realitykings provides a decent mix of ethnic variety. I'd estimate that about 50% of the girls are white Americans, 20% are Europeans, 20% are Latinas and 10% are African Americans. Unfortunaltely Asian girls are underrepresented on Realitykings. The girls are usually grouped into different sites based on ethnicity. While this makes finding ethnic content easier it also limits the possible fantasies. You will not find any black girls on "CFNM secret" or "Hot Bush" for instance.

In terms of fetishes Realitykings doesn't stray far from mainstream porn. The lesbians still look pretty straight to me, the "first time audition" girls still act quite professionaly and the "CFNM" girls still drop their panties. If you are not strictly looking for fetish content these "almost niche" sites provide a nice introduction to various fantasies though.
The sites could use some descriptions or introductions. Who would know what "Flower Tucci" is or could tell the difference between "8th street latinas" and "Saturday Night Latinas".

Video quality is excellent for all newly released content - if you judge by standards of four years ago. Honestly, I was a bit disappointed by the clarity and overall quality of the videos. They are still pleasant to watch and by no means bad, but one of the big names in online porn can certainly do better than this. Even the eastern European sites have upgraded their equipment quite a while ago. Surely they don't have a bigger budget than Realitykings.
I also wish Realitykings would upgrade their older content. Some of the best scenes from "Mike in brazil" are from 2005/2006 and video specs like "480x320 20.00fps 500Kbps" simply don't cut it.

All picture sets accompany a matching video and are produced in the same way: The actors play out a scene similar to the video shoot and the photographer constantly clicks away with his camera. This results in extremely large picture sets with often more than 600 pictures in a single set. The pictures only have a slightly higher resolution than the video content which comes out to a resolution of 0.27 to 0.54 Megapixels *cough*. I don't think any pic-lover can be content with this.
Cleary these pictures are meant to be viewed as a slideshow and, actually, I can recommend the sites slideshow feature as an alternative to the streaming video. The picture is much clearer than the streaming and even the downloaded video, and the pix are often shot at a better angle too.

I was quite pleased with the cross site search of Realitykings. It will match model names, site names, keywords and descriptions of the scenes. A search for "asian" gives me 123 results across all sites, which is about 2% of their total content. Finding scenes with asians any other way would require a lot of effort. It is also possible to make searches like "asian AND blonde" or "asian NOT 1on1". Some scenes are tagged incorrectly though.
*zoidberg voice* Hooray! I exceeded the maximum review lenghth */zoidberg voice*

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


morgentau (12) more of the bottom line (sry about this):

I did not expect any HD content when I joined the site, so I'm only mildly annoyed with their false advertisement. Be warned though that this is NOT a HD site (yet). I was more annoyed with the advertisements inside the members area and used an adblocker to get rid of them.

The daily download limit of 10GB equals about 15hrs of content. I think this is reasonable since they have to pay for their bandwidth too, so I didn't include it in the cons.

If you spot one of their special offers - I joined for 15$ a month - do not hesitate to join. Due to the sheer amount and variety of content you most certainly will find at least a few sites to your liking. This holds especially true if you're still somewhat new to the world of porn and you are looking mostly for mainstream content.

08-22-09  04:19pm

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) This is definitely a well written review - I wish more people would take the time to include all those details. But... mediocre to poor video and picture quality, repetitive content and, false advertising? I know we all put different weight on different things, but with all those cons, I can't quite make out what's left to warrant a score like that.
08-22-09  05:05pm

Reply To Message


morgentau (12) REPLY TO #2 - RagingBuddhist :

I can forgive the repetetive content since 5000+ scenes make it rather difficult to bring something new with every update. If you sort the videos by top rated and simply download the best 20 of every site you can easily skip the bland stuff.

Also, I view RK as a pure video site, just like Met-Art is a pure picture site to me. If you regard the pictures as an online slideshow exclusively they aren't that bad at all.

I joined just a fews days before they started advertising HD, so I got what I expected.

08-22-09  05:20pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.