Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West (0)

BabyGetReal (32) 07-30-09  03:07pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Uniquely natural / real models (average women).
- Natural settings without glossy editing.
- Genuine amateurs (not even pro-am!)
Cons: - Little or no chemistry or sexual excitement in most videos.
- Most videos are older, and have very poor resolution.
- Often (not always) very jerky camera work. Makes me seasick!
- Many videos have low contrast, no real blacks, so are like watching through a steamy window.
Bottom Line: I was intrigued by the Annie's truly unique approach and values, as I understood them from the reviews here and from looking at the site as a non-member. I definitely appreciate porn done by women with real female arousal -- at least I think I do (need more cases now). I watched the 4 trailers for boy/girl videos, and they seemed promising. The site says 500 videos -- so I figured there must be at least 100 b/g videos. So I joined hoping for some b/g videos with real arousal, female orgasms, and other things that I like (see my profile, and the forum "Against the grain").

Unfortunately, I have to agree with PU reviewer ramscrota. As a whole, the b/g videos offered by this site are pathetic.

First, quantity and resolution. Only 24 are listed, 2 of which are mis-indexed (they have no boys). Half of these, 13, are available only in very low resolution, highly compressed blurry 480 x 360 pixels mpg. Later vids move up to 640 x 360 wmv, then more recentlhy 770 x 435 mp4 or wmv without the blurring compression.

Worst of all, in most of the b/g videos, the couple seems to be working for the camera woman, trying hard (sometimes difficulty with erection) without being very horny or aroused. Sometimes they are clearly too hot, sweaty, and uncomfortable, and in some outdoor scenes the flies are quite distracting/disgusting.

So, after looking at all of the b/g scenes and finding very little, I looked at some of the g/g or solo videos. Since I find genuine arousal exciting, I looked mostly at the ones where the description indicated an orgasm. Again, most of these were simply unexciting. Natural down to earth people, just not very expressive or excited people.

As others have said, the models are a cross section of body types, ages, and personalities -- but all presented in very natural form, little or no makeup. I like that approach, but not the results here. Also one of the two camera women is often crossing the viewport, or her shadow, which I found realistic but somewhat distracting.

Overall, I have to say that for me, joining this site was a waste of money.

All that said, I did find a few vids that I downloaded and didn't erase after one viewing. Larissa's Manhunt is hilarious and she is really entertaining and sexy. Unfortunately, the 4 segments end without any sex or orgasms. (I deleted those.) The following b/g videos had some real sexual energy, excitement, and orgasms:
- Jasmine & Lee, Caravan Sex
- Timbo fucks Kim (silly overacting, but real multiple orgasms)
- Samantha and Maxwell was a really tender, affectionate, and hot video.
- Vince and Miah were fun.

After watching a couple of dozen solo and g/g videos (generally not my thing) the only one I am keeping is
- Daisy Duke & Alma (real horny excitement and energy and orgasms)

All of the above except Timbo were available in reasonable resolution.

Honorable mention goes to Kim's motorcycle video (3 parts). No orgasms but an amazing concept, pretty well done.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


mbaya (366) I thought of this as a photo site. How are they? Often photo sites have weak videos.
07-30-09  04:01pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) Didn't I warn you in some other thread about the quantity of b/g material? BTW, I agree with your present assessment, and their videos were never very good. I went mostly for the pictures.
07-30-09  04:25pm

Reply To Message


BabyGetReal (32) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

I didn't spend much time with the photos, but I think they were pretty good within the philosophy of this site. Long dimension of photos were 800 px (early sets) to 2,000 pixels (recent sets). Photos were well lit, sharp, clear.
07-30-09  05:00pm

Reply To Message


BabyGetReal (32) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Yes, you warned me, and so did ramscrota. The site seemed so unusual I wanted to see it for myself. Once I get enough points that I can start to trust people, you'll be trusted for sure!
07-30-09  05:01pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - BabyGetReal :

Always keep in mind that even people who appear to have the same taste can still have major differences of opinion when it comes to a site. Something in our brains seems to be triggered by certain faces or situations or positions or actions of the models. Even something they wear might bring back highly erotic memories .. and my brain might go WOW while yours might go BOOOORING! So don't trust too much. :-) What usually decides me is a combination of favorable review by TBP, PU (reviews and comments), and a tour of the site itself, before I subscribe to it. And, sadly, even after all that I get burned at times. Good hunting for THE site!
07-30-09  06:28pm

Reply To Message


BabyGetReal (32) REPLY TO #5 - messmer :

Sounds right -- points taken!
07-31-09  04:37pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.