Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit abbywinters

abbywinters (0)

Active
80
messmer (137) 07-22-09  01:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Large archive of beautiful "next door" kind of models.

Picture sets are technically excellent and come in zipped format. Videos have improved quite a bit from the last time I wrote a review, and they were good even then, but still fall short of those of the new, more up-to-date HD format carrying sites.

True to its niche.

Excellent download speed.
Cons: The biggest con is that this site was split up into three different ones. I got a special returning members rate for all three but, to me, it is still unfathomable why they would do that.

For instance, there will never be any long term subscribers to their g/g site because updates are so slow in coming, so this move does not seem very wise.

As others have pointed out, both photo sets and videos have become boring because the "tease factor" (according to the webmaster) is being stretched out too much. Maybe they really toned things down in anticipation of the coming raid?

When it comes to the photo sets, I hate those shots of one breast, or part of a hip etc. I don't see the reason for them. Show the whole model in landscape now and then and give us some pink!

My personal beef (not influencing the score) is that when it comes to underwear, cotton and wool appear to triumph. It would be so nice to see something glistening and silky under those jeans and sweaters once in a while.
Bottom Line: For those who yearn for technical details, my apologies, two months plus after having been a returning member I cannot remember them (except that they had switched to a crisper mp4 format for their latest videos) and I have nothing on my hard drive to go by because, of all the downloads from all three sites, nothing was kept. Regrettable for an ex-favorite.

Which will definitely explain why I lowered the score from my original review (90) to a more realistic (for these times) 80.

My favorite site of natural girls being slightly naughty has become a ho-hum triple site of natural girls being coy.

The technical quality is still there, the large archive is still there, the girls are still pretty so, for those who like their porn very soft, it would still be a pretty fair site .. if only they hadn't split it up. I really couldn't recommend a single site of theirs for the price they ask for.

P.S. Two months or so later: For honesty's sake, I did come across some g/g and IM video clips I had kept recently so I take back what I said above about having deleted everything. But sadly what I had kept was still slim pickings from a triple site and does not affect the score.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RagingBuddhist (63) Well... I didn't want to start a war of words with the site rep. She was obviously trying to spin a negative into a positive (her job, for sure) but, since you mentioned the tease factor, I'll come out with it.

There's something about the seeming trend of long videos and large picture sets with very little skin that goes way beyond a tease. I've editted about 20 videos so far, chopping out the cheesecake, and have already cut over 3 gigs off the hard drive. I just cannot make myself believe that they actually think people want to download huge files like that, just to wade through all the fluff.

And, yeah, I thought about the possibility of it being a reaction to their recent legal trouble too. But, whatever the reason, I think what they're doing is going to hurt their sign-ups. Especially since the site split. It's just too much money for too little nudity.

Other than the newbies doing reviews here (which I don't even take seriously) look at what's being written about the site. Last year, we never saw phrases like "wouldn't recommend", "passed it's peak" and "photo sets and videos have become boring". I'm almost sorry to say I hope they do take a hit in their membership - maybe it'll push them back to being the site that so many raved about before.

07-22-09  01:59pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :

To think I'm always the one (on other sites) who asks for a bit more of a tease before they (b/g, g/g) get down to business! But AW are definitely overdoing it these days. Because of its nature the g/g site would be a bit more explicit but in connection with the other two sites .. arghh, I agree with your sentiments completely. And I, too, wish I could have my old, undivided, exciting, refreshing AW back!
07-22-09  02:15pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.