Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Exclusive Club

Exclusive Club (0)

MargulisAZ (84) 06-30-09  05:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some good spreading, gaping, and extreme shoots.
Decent movie download options (full movie included).
Good amount of screen caps per video.
Forum and blog are kind of cool.
A few really hot models.
Cons: Very slow download speeds (100 kb/s).
Low amount of content (46 shoots)
Infrequent updates (once per week).
Small amount of content added with updates (either 1 vid or 1 photoshoot).
Broken links abound on site.
Only 1 or 2 videos per girl.
Many unattractive models.
Expensive for quality of content.
Bottom Line: Overall I was disappointed with this site. It has some potential but definitely needs a lot of work. I joined for the Sam update since I love gaping pussies and she is probably the best one on there in my opinion. Wish there was more of her, but as with all the models, you are only going to get a couple photo shoots and a couple videos. Here are some points of interest:

1. According to the webmaster members should get around 300 kb/s on downloads, but I never got above more than 125 or so, always hanging around 100 kb/s. Downloading the best quality movie on some girls took 3 hours.

2. Updates only come once a week, and even that update is only 1 set for a model. Not 1 whole model, just 1 set for a model. So, one week you might get a picture set of a model, then wait another week for 1 movie for a model, etc. In other words, don't expect a lot of new content here. The site has been out for years and there are only 46 main models to choose from, each of which only have a few photo sets and 1 or 2 videos. There is a vault with extra content in it from the older days but most of this is very poor quality, and often times the links don't even work to download the stuff.

3. Broken links. Unacceptable as far as I'm concerned on a site that I pay for. Only this site and Simon Scans have I seen so many broken links. If you go into the vault and try to download some of the older videos, many just link you back the main page of the site. I even found this to happen on some of the newer content as well. Nothing is more frustrating than seeing something that makes you think, "this looks hot, let me download it", only to find that you aren't going to be downloading a damn thing when the link is busted.

4. The scenes themselves mostly revolve around solo masturbations and examination videos which involve some stretching and gaping, along with speculum use. The scenes are decent, but there just needs to be more of them, and at an increased pace.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


nccsite (2)
ok, you obviously missed the point of the site :(

I am very disspointed with your review and I am afraid you compare uncomparable. This site is targeted to certain group of people who likes gyno examinations, doctor settings, kinky gyno exams and similar stuff and believe it or not it is considered by many guys to be the best in the niche.

When mentioning three hours download - yes, can be, we do not own whole internet and can not guaranteee the speed, the server is connected on the backbone in the centre of Europe, not our fault the speed from whole world is not as fast as it should be, even although we ar enot happy about it. But the video you mentioned is HD over 1Gb in size - there is Flash playing instantly or smaller sizes videos...

Being targeted site you can not expect updates several times per day. Where wouls we get money for it? This site will never have as many members as any huge network site, simply because it is content only small group of people likes. Unfortunately it is all connected..

Broken links - as you said mainly in the Vault, it was just kept from the old version of site just to give members look to the older days. The newer content in most cases works just fine but nothing is perfect..And of course the old content looks terrible, how were cameras back in 1999? But thats just the tiny part of the site, just an extra.

Of course I agree many things can be improved but I am pretty sure our site is worth the price and your review completely misses the good points and the main thing - the site is for the people who likes gyno exams and gyno/doctor fetish.

06-30-09  07:10pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) REPLY TO #1 - nccsite :

I read the review and there are a few things I disagree with and agree with. The fact that the site is 'small' should not be put as a con because according to TBP facts, this site was launched around OCT 2008 and the TBP states there are more than 69 videos at that time, MargulisAZ states there are only 46 at his time of his review. Something is going on here because that's a lot of 'missing' shoots that should not be missed. Were these the broken links he was talking about? If so, this is unacceptable to have more han 20 missing videos not available for download. I have been a member of Gyno-X which appears to be a quite similar site and they update about the same plus in the same fashion and that is a premier site in this type of material so I don't think that should be a con in itself. Once a week is decent for a specialized niche.

MargulisAZ states that the site has spreading, speculums, gaping, etc. but the content needs more of this. I'm a bit confused because isn't this what this site is, so what is the other content that is being updating that would not constitute as being this kind of material?

As far as promising only 300 kbps these days for a single download means there is something wrong with the bandwith being provided for the site itself. That is extremely slow and I have joined plenty of Euro based servers that exceed this speed. It is a con and should be accepted as one.

I am interested in this type of content and never knew about this site until now, so consider me a potential customer. This is why I am asking these questions to both MargulisAZ and the webmaster who responded. Any more information pertaining to the questions I asked would be greatly appreciated. I am not taking sides because that's not my style. I just read the review plus the responses provided and proposed subjective questions for both of you to better help others and myself in understanding the site.

06-30-09  07:44pm

Reply To Message


nccsite (2)
REPLY TO #2 - GCode :

Let me reply to your inquiries. There are no shoots missing. TPB data are not from re-launching the site in Oct 08 but from Aprial 09 as they are updating the facts from time to time.
The site is updated regulary once a week with fresh and exclusive content we shoot - not any bought content, not any non exclusive content. I already mentioned what is in members are with each girl, solo photoset, nurse phtoset, gyno exam photoset, gyno exam HD videos and solo or nurse HD video with girl gaping her pussy and playing with speculum.
You can never please everyone so I understand MargulisAZ does not like the site and the content, but I can not see how more gyno exam content and pussy details content should be there. It is only the content I mentioned.
It is up to personal taste if the girls are pretty or not. We got many requests to keep the girls exactly as they are, in my opinion they are mostly nice, of course dont expect Playboy type girls. But thats what members said they do not want, most of them wants regular girls. So they are getting them.
We are trying to give the best we can so we are giving out to members HD videos in 1280x720 resolution and photoset 2000x1500 pics. But especially the HD videos are fairly big in size, usually 1,2Gb. Members seem to generally like the site cause there is a lot of them online in the members area every day. Imagine just 20 of them would be downloading HD video at same time. Then you will have difficulty not downloading but even browsing the site. Thats why we force 300kb/s download limit. To ensure all members have fair access. As I already stated this is what we force and the serve is sitting on backbone. It is internet and we can not guarantee the speed for everyone. Unfortunately :(
Anyway beside downloading HD videos there is absolutely no problem with speed, for browsing the site, downloading pictures, watching Flash videos it is pretty fast even if you are unlucky and can not get 300kbs. Beside HD videos normal videos are available to download for those with slower connection.
Missing links: I took my time and browsed through the Vault. Honestly I though it will be MUCH worse cause the Vault section was just taken from the previous version of the site. Marquis must have had really bad luck when trying the Vault links. In video section I coulted only ONE broken video. the other section NO broken links except Gallery section where I counted 6 links that should lead to videos (out of almost 70 girls there!). Overall I counted 7 broken links out of thousands links there. I spent quite long time there but of course except the videos I wasnt clicking everything cause it would take the whole day but what I tried was working except links mentioned.
Overall, based on the Marquis review the site looks like sh*t which definetely is not. The site is regulary updates, we take care of this site and it has been living. For sure there is room for improvement...

07-01-09  03:59am

Reply To Message


mbaya (366) REPLY TO #2 - GCode :

Hi GCode,
Did you ever join the site? What did you think of it?

04-03-10  07:46pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) REPLY TO #4 - mbaya :

I never did join :( I have been trying to catch up with some finincial things and have not joined anything in a few months :( Still looks like an interesting site for this kind of content, it is on my list of sites to try.
04-04-10  02:31pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.