Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Shemale Japan

Shemale Japan (0)

Active
68
zergling (8) 06-19-09  02:19am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -all models are from japan
-good site speed
-i honestly cant think of any more pros about the site
Cons: -terrible video work(thats still terrible now)
-high site price
-not many extras
-does nt seem to be any plans to properly train the camera man
Bottom Line: i have joined this stie twice first off i was not impressed at all now the second time i can say the site has improved but not by much im still rather dissappointed .I honestly struggled to find two positive things about the site.One of the positives was all the models are from japan and some of the girls are very cute.One girl called marin is a star but is completely ruined by what i deem a terrible camera man i will explain later.first off the pic sets are decent im not sure what the dimensions are but they are clear and well presented.Now the video work on the site is what i was really interested in and its aweful in my opinion first off as stated in a early review a video of a model seemed to be broken into 2 to 3 updates,first video was usually a strip second was a masterbation scene or a camera man forgeting his job and getting a blowjob which i gather most people did nt want to see then the third was a cumshot.this was true and a fair bit of the older videos were done on this policy.Now the camera man invovled has seemed to be limited which is good but as for some videos just being a simple strip tease this has nt stop for example a recent new video i downloaded of a girl called yuna(updated 11th of june)is nothing more than a striptease the video goes for 11.49 mins and you dont see this girls cock until 7 mins 23 i personally think this is unacceptable to paying members.Now theres a few videos like this which is annoying ITS A PORN SITE im sure most members dont wantto see 6 to 7 mins of a fully clothed girl.I also found personally most the videos to be rather boring alot of the models dont seem to be excited nor was there much erotic feeling to alot of the videos.The site does have some great moments like a yuna cumshot explosion cum flys for metres but there far and few between I personally think the site would be much better with a new professional camera man but thats just me.As for video quality i have no complaints there wmv format and have two options 320x240 or 640x480.In closing i think the site has alot of imporving to do.Maybe they should take a leaf out of lb-69.com book on now to construct quality professional video work cos its needed badly.Now i may get a blasting for this rather negitive review but its my review and this is the way i feel about the site some people might disagree but i stick by all what i have said here

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

GCode (101) Good review which I mostly agree with. The sad fact is that Grooby will always update their content like this and they fully believe that this is what people want because they have been doing it this way for so long. It's a shame for the people like me and you who prefer one update with a full 10-20 minutes strip to masterbation scene ending in cum shot opposed to their way of updating with smaller lengthed videos involving just undressing and bj's. In your assumption that most members want to see content like we do, I do believe you are right. However, I do believe the webmaster of the Grooby sites believes the way they are updating now is the better way and probably has some good reinforcement of these beliefs if he is going to state that his members like the updates like this. But, honestly, don't feel like your in the minority for wanting updates like the way we want them. This is how the large majority of TS and non-TS sites update so obviously we have some basis for wanting the updates how we do.

However, I can see how Grooby believes this is a good way of updating. It does provide for quicker updates plus more content which a lot of people probably want. Personally, I can handle one update a week with a full length strip, masterbation, to cum shot video and maybe one hardcore scene as opposed to 3-4 updates a week with other content. But, I can see others wanting the other way as well. It's all open for debate for sure.

As far as you stating that you will get negative responses for not liking the site, I believe that it is your review and you clearly state the reasons why you feel negatively about the site. So, don't feel like you are doing something wrong by doing such a review.

As for my review, I want to re-join when I get the chance and do a re-review with all the considerations and conversations I've had with others and the webmaster to get a better and more complete review. But, I like your review as it stands and I hope to see more reviews from you from the TS niche which has only a small fanbase here at PU.

06-19-09  12:19pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.