Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit VideosZ

VideosZ (1)

largeun (9) 05-18-09  04:05am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Vast library covering most genres
Decent navigation
Cheap and competitive
Has content that some competitors don't supply
Regular and prolific updates
Good bookmarking system
Cons: Selective formats and few options
Quality average at best
Misleading search content, but then most sites do this
Removing a bookmarked scene reverts you to page 1 of your saved bookmarks. That can be annoying if you are on page 93 of your bookmarked scenes
Non exclusive content
Repetitive content titled differently. This is a trick that most sites adopt and is an underhand way of 'adding' content
No 'scene to scene' selection for download
Bad searches on stars that share the same names
Not enough niche content - I searched for Teen-Anal-Asian-Lingerie and only got a few hits. That made me sad
Bottom Line: I am not sure I am convinced about this site.

Of course, the immediate comparable is Videobox which I believe has better quality content, better niche content and the 'scene to scene' download option is a winner.

I am also not convinced on quality. It is one thing converting the source content to a higher res format, but it's another if the source content already exists in a low grade res and all you are doing is providing a claimed higher res format that adds nothing to the quality of the original. I downloaded a bunch of clips that looked good as images when auditioning and were highly dodgy when viewed, even at MP4.

The quality issue really is hit and miss and out of the ..ahem...104 clips I downloaded only 12 were good enough to keep.
I recently lost my bat vision abilities and watching some of the grainy shit was akin to taping my eyes with surgical stockings and then trying to watch a 10x10 pixel video clip from 9 kilometres during the Perfect Storm.

In terms of sheer volume of content you can't really go wrong and the recent PU discounted price makes it a steal. And TBH that is the only reason I gave this site a rating of 82.

If you put the price aside then it's an average site with tons of very average low res content of well known run of the mill stars.

Remastering old material into hi res content is, of course, time consuming and costly in terms of bandwidth and server space. But FFS these sites make an absolute fortune so don't be conned into thinking they are doing us a favour.

Sites that offer hi res and exclusive content, albeit at a cost, are the future as we now posses the means to watch in any format and with no restrictions on cpu handling.

It's time 'these' site like VZ and VidBox upped their game because reviews 5 years down the road will simply slate and ignore them.
Quantity is one thing but it's ultimately quality that always wins, and I, for one, am willing to pay the difference to attain this.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


jd1961 (95) Videosz needs the scene editor that Videobox has.
05-20-09  12:52am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.