Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica (0)

enigma (2) 03-09-09  04:58am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - clear, focused style: You find young, girls with mostly small or medium sized tits "teeny"-style.
- regular (dated!) updates, which allows the user to find out how often the site is updated.
- these two pros also have their drawbacks as described below!
Cons: The cons consist, in my opinion of two different apects: the style of the site and the transparency of the updates:

- the clear style, which I also mentioned as a pro can become a little boring, if you subscribe to the site on a regular basis or for a long amount of time. You get the sapphic-erotica-style. No less, but also no more!
There seems to be hardly any "evolution" concerning the style of the site. It stays, say, 60%-hardcore as it has been for the last couple of years, while other sites keep their style but adept to the overall development in the porn-industry. But maybe their customers like it that way.

- Regular updates without transparency:
There is (to my knowledge) no means to have a look at the latest updates without joining the site, which would be no problem since the updates are mostly of very good quality.
Bottom Line: Over the last 4 years I have been been a member to this site for 10-12 times.

As mentioned above, the quality of the pictures and videos is very good and old videos even have been re-coded in order to adapt them to our times where high bandwidth is easily available and most people like high-resolution videos.

The drawbacks come from the clear focused style of the site, that does not seem to allow for "evolution": Another type of girl here and there or a little less or more "hardcore" sex here and there. But that may be intentionally so and since the site is on top of most rankings for lesbian porn most users might not share my opinion on that style. Please feel free to reply. I look forward to your comments or a discussion! Thanks for reading!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


badandy400 (103) I like the perspective this review gives. Some site do not change, which can be a good thing. If the keeps the same style than people can know what to expect if they had been there before or seen the videos elsewhere. This site is on my "join soon" list. I was a member a while back and am looking to update my collection.

Welcome to PornUsers!

03-10-09  08:29pm

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) Interesting review of Sapphic Erotica. I've never been a member of the site, and that might be partly why I have trouble understanding your ideas. You appear to write in clear, precise English, at first glance, but trying to understand what you actually mean is difficult for me.

I'm not trying to make fun of your English. I've always had a poor ability to learn any foreign language. So you are accomplishing something which I would not be able to do: writing a review in a foreign language.

But I think it would be better for you to write your review first in your native language, and then translate that review into English.

I would guess that you wrote this review in English, not your native language (which is German, I assume).

One simple example of what I mean when I write that I do not understand the meaning of what you write.

You write:
"I have been a regular subscriber to the site for the last, say, 4 years. Since then I was a member for about 10-12 times at least."

If you have been a regular subscriber to the site for the last 4 years, that implies that for the last 4 years you have been a regular subscriber.

So how can you have been a member for 10-12 times since then? You are writing that you have been a member for the last 4 years, which means that you are a member now, and have been, for the last 4 years. So, to count that as 1 continuous membership, and then to count separately 10-12 memberships since then, does not make sense. There was no time for you to be a member 10-12 times since the current time.

And when the 10-12 memberships did take place, is also slightly confusing.

Possibly you meant to write that over the last 4 years you have been been a member 10-12 times.

Sorry if I appear to be picky. Feel free to ignore me. Your review is interesting, almost like poetry, where you sense meaning in the words, but the ideas are something you have to clarify and puzzle out.

I hope to see more reviews from you, and hope they have as many or even more of your ideas and opinions.

03-11-09  11:38am

Reply To Message


enigma (2) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Hi lk2fireone!
Thank you for your answer. I hope I could at least correct the problem with my "10-12 memberships" in 4 years. ;-) You are right, my native language is german and it seems this makes my English not as clear as I hoped it is.
When I write my next review I hope I can make it more comprehensible.
Thanks again and all the best!

03-12-09  04:55am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.