Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (1)

Active
90
exotics4me (463) 03-02-09  12:50pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - As with both ALS sites, the quality and completeness of the content is as good and high as it gets.
- Newer videos hit to true HD 1920x1080 resolution, even the older ones are 720 high end.
- Picture sets are beyond complete, one picture set, Anita Pearl Scene 2, when downloaded in high resolution is...912 MB! Pictures can go up to 3800 high end and some of the sets near 400 pictures.
- Excellent download speeds, though can't get it to work with DL Manager, will allow resume in Firefox though.
- Some very good old content that features some of porn's biggest names when they were younger, love the old Anetta Keys sets
Cons: - Had a frustrating experience as a member of both ALS Angels, ALS Scan, seems their sign-in page goes through the same server. So, when I clicked members to bring up my saved login information, it would be ALS Angels username and password, even though I was on ALS Scan, never happened before last month.
- See the above one and why this one makes the con list, after signing in to get in members area, have to sign in again when you go to download a video, so the confused server was causing me major headaches in accessing content.
- The models as a whole are beautiful, but they are almost all very, very skinny.
Bottom Line: ALS Scan has been a favorite of mine for awhile now. I can see and agree with some of the complaints like the content is repetitive, but I can get over that for the high quality.

A common complaint that I have with both ALS sites is that the navigation can be confusing. I've signed in before, clicked the button for models, only to click a set and be asked to sign in again, what the hell? I just signed in! They do have what looks to be a separate model page for members, and I guess for whatever reason, I wasn't on it, instead, on the guest's model page, even though I had just signed in. Then there was the confusion with the server giving me my ALS Angels username and password when signing in on ALS Scan and of course, those are different so it rejected my sign-in attempt.

Minor complaints? Sure. But can be a bit of a hassle, especially for the impatient.

Quality wise this site is as good as any. I am not positive on this, but I want to believe the lowest quality videos are 720 high end, and the newer videos are 1920 high end. I might be nitpicking a little, but I do think this could be a negative for some members, a lot of the newer videos have 1280 high end as the LOWEST quality option and if you have a slow connection, you are going to be there awhile just to get the lowest quality ones. Some of the lowest quality videos are 500 MB for some scenes.

On the other hand, if you love the high quality this is a great site. The quantity is also very high. Much higher than sister site ALS Angels.

I'm one of the ones that likes the huge picture sets that have 200-400 photos in each set, so I really like that about ALS, the newer picture sets are almost as big of a file as the videos!

My complaints are minor when compared to the quality and quantity. They do also go back and remaster older content, kind of frustrating, since they take members votes on which sets to remaster and it rarely is the ones I am wanting remastered. This site does have an added bonus for collectors, since there is some older content of Sandy from Club Sandy, Anetta Keys as Alana, the retired and irreplaceable Mia Stone and Sophie Moone.

In general, the ALS staff, photographers, seem to have good relationships/friendships with the models, so you get some natural laughs from the models and smiles that don't look fake. I really can't complain about the skinny models, because they do have the other site with the curvier models, but I do want to add it in case anyone is wondering about the style of models. Put it this way, Sandra Shine, Eve Angel and Eufrat were too curvy for this one and are on the ALS Angels site instead. Starting to wonder about that myself. Not saying ALS is milking two sites by splitting the top models between their sites, but it is starting to look a little suspicious since both sites must be using the same server/different port? to sign in.

Still, I recommend the site for the quality and amount of content.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

ControllingMind (Disabled) Nice review, I nearly joined this site. I liked the look of it, but the independant billers put me off, so I chose sapphic erotica instead. I've since read later on PU that the ALS billers are ok.

I'm not keen on sites that have no download manager support. Did you try any different download managers? or could the download manager block possibly be down to your site conflict login problem?

03-02-09  02:21pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (218) "the retired and irreplaceable Mia Stone and Sophie Moone."

Agree totally that those two are irreplaceable. Well said! (Mia is my most "irreplaceable.") Whenever they post a reduxed photoset of one of them (and there should be quite a few more on the way), I sit bolt upright in my computer chair and start perusing and downloading like a maniac.

03-02-09  04:32pm

Reply To Message

3

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #1 - ControllingMind :

I know that there are those that really like Sapphic Erotica - I was a member on a couple of occasions and found it to be like watching paint dry as compared to ALS Scan, which has the best girl/girl stuff on the net by far, in my opinion.
03-02-09  06:30pm

Reply To Message

4

exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

I found some Mia with Eve content on the defloration site. Seeing the two of them together again was great, but the story was maybe the worst I've ever seen. You'll like the premise, "Both of these ladies are virgins and are going to let us pop their cherries with sex toys". Not for sure but I don't think a sex toy de-virginizes a woman, and the material really doesn't look that old.

Mia was the first blonde in porn that I really liked and started collecting. My comment about the voting on the sets to remaster was mainly about the Mia content on ALS, I have found some content of her on older sites as Illona, never knew she had an alias besides Mia. I was surprised to see her on videobox too, they have several of her boy/girl scenes. Oh and before I forget, on the defloration site, an included loud pop happens and the dildo comes out all red ha ha.

03-04-09  10:36am

Reply To Message

5

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #4 - exotics4me :

Thanks, exotics. I joined defloration once quite a while ago and I think that was when Mia and Eve were appearing on it. I remember there wasn't much solo Mia there, and I was kind of let down by what they had.

As for that site, they used to post the entire list of updates with a pic for each, but since they stopped doing that -- again, quite some time ago -- I've shyed away from it.

03-04-09  03:28pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.