Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Mano Job

Mano Job (0)

TrashMan (103) 02-18-09  04:11pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +Videos are HQ 640x480
+Two download qualities available, and scenes available in full or split-scene
+Site search, works well
+Movies come with associated HQ image set and screencaps, 100+ images in each.
+When viewing images you have the age old next/previous/gallery controls
+Haha, they provide short clips of the cumshot in slow motion. Hilarious. The one with newbie Amia Moretti is splatterific.
+Associated forum. But stupid thing requires secondary login, though.
+Long description of each movie seems like it comes genuinely from the girl, but I have a hard time believing it.
+*APPLAUSE* Every scene, from the most recent to the earliest, is available in the same high quality format. I can't say that older videos were ever poorer quality, but its good to know that everything is standardized, something many other sites have failed to do with their OWN PRODUCED VIDEOS WHICH THEY HAVE THE SOURCE!
+100% exclusive content
Cons: -Watermarked videos
-Poor update schedule - 1 update/wk. I can't determine the update schedule on ChelciFox because videos aren't date-tagged, but TheDickSuckers is date tagged, and it too is 1 per wk, so update schedule is more like 2 per wk.
-Poor organization. So they apparently are at v2 of their layout, but v2 is no better than v1. 5 updates per page, 49 pages...are you kidding? They really need a gallery page - 5 columns, 10 rows, 1 page. Not hard at all.
-No ZIP downloads for picture galleries
-You get access to TheDickSuckers and ChelciFox but you would never know because they do not advertise it well. And the links are not auto-login, you have to login again.
-Login process includes image verification
-Generic file names (01.wmv)
-Lower quality download is non-natural 448x336 resolution. 480x360 is a better choice in my opinion.
-Expensive $30/mo
Bottom Line: Overall, it is a decent network of sites but it is nothing to get excited over. Both of the network sites (that arent ChelciFox.com) are dedicated to girls performing POV-style on a guy's hardware. It works for a little while, but it gets tired fast. Some of the vids involve sex of some sort (watch the Amia Moretti scene, she tells the guy behind the camera that she is going to FUCK HIM and tells him NOT to fuck her...very hot), but again, POV-style...works for a bit, but gets tired fast.

The organization is piss-poor terrible. 5 updates per page, with a shitload of text and all download links. It makes a verrrrrrry long page, lots of scrolling. 5 per page, 49 pages...what a waste. They need to look at sites like AdultRealityPass, or Brazzers, or NaughtyAmerica or any SANE porn site...hell, just take a look at Google Images. EMPLOY A GALLERY!!! Yes, it will make your archive look smaller, but it will at least make it easier to find and enjoy content. 5x49 = 245 videos (approximate)...if you make it 5 rows and 5 columns you get 25 updates per page, 10 pages - not all that hard, and 10 pages is still a lot of updates. When I use ManoJob (and the network site TheDickSuckers) I feel like I'm browsing one of those poorly made sites on the AdultBouncer or DeluxePass network...yuck.

The quality of the material is good, but the lack of ZIP downloads, lack of a good update schedule and the lack of decent organization are big deal breakers.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


jd1961 (95) I never get tired of POV myself. I hate the stunt dicks (as they call them here) they should have their hands tied behind their backs, mouths taped shut, and a bag over their head as far as I'm concerned! But that's me, and this is a niche site that caters to this. So I see it as a positive.

No zip files is inexusable. Thanks for getting on their case, all these sites need zip files.

The model search here is a mess. They need to upgrade the look of their site.

02-25-09  08:40am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.