Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit David Nudes

David Nudes (0)

lk2fireone (194) 01-15-09  08:09am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)

Ban this site.

Life is unfair. I read that David (the photographer of this site) is married to Tatyana, who is a model. If his wife is the Tatyana featured on david-nudes, then PU members should nuke this site, because no photographer deserves a wife as gorgeous as this one.

Tatyana is the best-looking model on this site. There are apparently very few models, because this is a new site (site started mid-2008), but the site advertises 4 updates per week.

A unique feature of the site is the commentary on the set-up of the photo-shoots, model prep, etc. This would mainly appeal to would-be photographers, I assume. "You can learn how each session was created, from the technical photography issues, such as lighting, camera setup, location work, to finding and working with the models!"

So someone like Toadsith might find this site appealing.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (3)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) Tatyana the model is married to the site photographer, David Weisenbarger. But at least he is willing to share her photographs with us. He does a nice job capturing this lovely young woman on film, along with other young models. Extremely nice photos in the style of met-art (teen/young-women glam photos).
01-15-09  12:37pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (220) I read some time ago at eurobabeindex that Lizzie of evasgarden (etc.) is either the girlfriend or wife of one of their photographers. That's not fair, either! ;)

But about DavidNudes, I find the site layout to be very confusing. You click "photos" at the top and you get a page with a bunch of videos listed first. Obviously, this is a fundamental flaw.

I'd joined once maybe early last year. Again the layout, and consequently the navigation, was confusing. And so many of the photosets were too dark! (Could they pony up for some lighting equipment at some point?) I wound up not getting ANYTHING and just avoiding logging in.

There's a lot of hype about the site. And that's pretty much it.

01-06-10  04:50am

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Personally, I think the model Tatyana is as good as you get. She's gorgeous, in my opinion, and the best thing at the site.

Her photosets alone are worth a 1-month membership, in my opinion. But if the models don't appeal to you, or you don't care for the photographs, then the site is a waste of your time and money.

I think the photographs are high quality. Yes, some of the photographs are too dark, but that's a flaw you find at almost all sites, on some of the photographs (poor lighting, poor focus, poor this-or-that).

But if you didn't find anything worth downloading, that must have been a real disappointment.

Sorry your membership turned out to be a waste of time and money. As you pointed out recently, there's always risk when joining a site.

01-06-10  12:30pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.