Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani (0)

Zack (0) 12-02-08  09:16am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (5)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Rachel has natural tits
2. You get other sites with your membership
3. She does hardcore
Cons: 1. Rachel's tits are not that attractive, something about them...
2. I think the biggest disappointment about this site is the Photos. They are way to Photoshopped. Someone needs to pull back on the clone tool.
3. The guys dick on the site is not that big...
4. Layout was not great
Bottom Line: For me, not only does the girl have to be attractive she needs a great personality and charm and I had a hard time finding Rachel's charm.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Cybertoad (Disabled) This site is among PU's top rated sites, and no one then this review has gone under 80 in any review of this site. You gave it the lowest possible review but said little as to why you rated it the lowest possible score. You are entitled to your review opinion, I just saw the review score as severely harsh given prior evidence by others shows it to be a very satifactory site.
12-02-08  11:19am

Reply To Message


mr smut (42) REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :

Hi Sir,

I think it's a great discrepancy between objective pros and cons and the explanation that should normally be given in the bottom line by Zack. I see about 2 1/2 pros and 1 1/2 maybe 2 cons with the rest not being explained in the conclusion of the review.

B.t.w. I can see the shape of her boobies in the preview and have to say that these are nice natural ones. I personally like what I see :-)


12-02-08  11:57am

Reply To Message


Cybertoad (Disabled) REPLY TO #2 - mr smut :

Yes she is a knock out for sure.
I was open to what they have to say of course just a 50 seemed very harsh.
And yes she is natural from what I know perhaps others can give input as well.


12-02-08  12:24pm

Reply To Message


badandy400 (103) As always, we welcome new members and try to help them on there way a bit.

My friendly advise is when whenever someone give a low 50s or high 90s score there needs to be very valid reasoning. it is going to be hard enough to convince people here that this site deserves such a low score, but it will not happen if you leave out details on the reason why.

Tell us why the issues you had were such a big deal to you. Saying "it is what it is because it is what it is" will not do the trick either, not that you have done that but it happens more often than we like.

Remember, the reviews we right are not for our own benefit, rather they are to help others. We all have different tastes. You have an issue with the shape of her tits which is fine, but I personally like them. But I can tell without paying whether or not I like how she looks by simply looking at a homepage or tour page. What is important in scoring is everything else. The model not having the features you are looking for does not constitute a 50! That would be like me doing to a solo site about a guy and giving it a 50 because I did not like the shape of his ass. Of course I would not like the shape of his ass, i am not into that sort of thing! So rating the site as a 50 would not be fair simply because it did not stand a chance with me, but someone else might come along and absolutely love the way the guy looks.

What would then be fair is for me to say I did not like his ass, then rate the site based on other features. Price, updates, videos and picture quality, amount of content, and so one.

Not liking a models tits is only worth a few points. There is much more to the site than that, and as I said, that taste will vary with each person that looks at your review. A good way to handle that is to say that you did not like them and to encourage the reader to check out the tour page first to make sure they have no issues with them. That would be a helpful suggestion to the reader and make you sound good. :)

Now about the guys dick. Many people going model sites because they are simply interested in the specific model. The dick she is sitting on becomes a little less of a concern. However, I will agree that an ugly guy can ruin a great scene as it can be distracting. Besides, small cocks make me feel better about myself!! :)

Just try to be as objective about your reviews as you can and load them with information. Your review is barely 12 lines, so it is more of a comment than a review. 12 lines simply is not enough content to convey your message. As for 50s, try not to write reviews while you are pissed off at a site about something. When a review is all negative people tend to not look at them because it is painfully obvious the person just wants to vent.

The bottom line here is: don not be talked out of your opinions about sites you like or dislike, just tell us exactly what puts them on your porntacular list or your shit list.

12-02-08  12:41pm

Reply To Message


badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #3 - Cybertoad :

Look, I am 23 and I love the look of nice tight teens with ripe, firm racks.

BUT...something about this woman really does the trick. I wish more women looked like her as they aged. She really does have an amazing ability to age....or perhaps an anti-aging machine! :)

A 50 will not hold much merit here with out a lot of logical, intelligent argument to why it deserves to be knock off. Which hopefully we will see.

But as it stands right now it does not matter much to scoring.

Oh and yes, gotta love those shapely naturals.

12-02-08  12:47pm

Reply To Message


mr smut (42) REPLY TO #4 - badandy400 :

Hello Andy,

that was in a lengthy explanation what I was trying to say. I only hope that you didn't waste to much energy or let's say I do hope that Zack is able to understand what our point of view is and that he will be willing and able to make his reviews helpful for others.


12-02-08  01:13pm

Reply To Message


badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #6 - mr smut :

That was the point. To not leave much to be interpreted.

I certainly hope I did not waste my time either. I did not intend for that posting to get that large!

12-02-08  01:17pm

Reply To Message


nygiants03 (162) You give Kelly Madison a 99, and Rachel Aziani a 50??? Something is not right here........
12-03-08  09:56pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.