Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit VideoBox

VideoBox (6)

Wittyguy (95) 11-03-08  10:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)

Random Thoughts From a JPEG Guy

There have been so many reviews here that I've just decided to add a couple of my own thoughts. I'm more of a picture guy so I don't do video only sites too often. The price is great, the multiple daily updates are great and so is the volume of content. My only disappointments were that most of the content was older, we'e talking years or decades old stuff and the quality is only average given the age and lack of top tier studio compilations. The search function is good which is needed for a site this size.

Overall, if you like pics along with your vids I'd save my money for something from 21st Sextury, Suze.net or DDF productions. With those you get current stuff, high quality plus pics but you lose out on the price on some of them. I don't have anything bad to say about this site; just realize that you do give up some things for the great price.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Drooler (220) I'm also a pics guy. Fortunately for those of us who are, some good things have come through of even older (but still great) material. DDF and ALS Scan have been reissuing older sets in larger sizes and better quality. (Do wish they'd do that with ALS Angels, too, and I asked about it but didn't get an answer.) And TeenDreams has been releasing what has to be some earlier material of Mia Stone in over 2100 pixels, and it looks pretty good.

I really appreciate this from those sites.

11-04-08  01:26am

Reply To Message

2

atrapat (112) Let me friendly disagree on most of the content being years or decades old. There is a fair amount of 90s porn and you aren't getting the scenes the day after the studio releases the original DVD. But, looking at this last week updates alone, I saw more than a handful of DVDs released in 2007-2008 and just a couple of 90s porn. And I wouldn't mind if they had more than the current 15 Jeanna Fine scenes (she's listed in 400+ titles at iafd).

As further proof, if you look at the stars with the most scenes you find mainly still active performers (Trina Micahels, Jenna Haze, Tory Lane, etc). If you go to the bottom of the list, you will find models who started last year with some movies (Missy Stone and Stephanie Cane already have at least 4 each one and they currently have only 20-30 movies at iafd).

The site has flaws (for instance, adding the DVD production date and the name of the male performers to the movies would be a nice touch) and it certainly would be nice if they could add the promo stills companies usually shoot for their movies (Wicked Pictures and Vivid are a couple of examples of companies which I believe that offer a good amount of picture content). But, as it currently is, I believe I'm not the only one who feels it's a dream come true.

11-04-08  12:02pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.