Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit LBFM

LBFM (0)

lurifax (0) 10-25-08  02:31pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (3)

Before spending your $$ on this...

...compare the site with:

For ages I have been pissed off by 'merchants' who pretend to sell you the moon - without delivering more than half a glance of it.

A niggardly 1GB/day is exactly that.

Noty only, but: The sister 'company' is doing the same, and the only reason, which I can imagine, for the very existance of the split into two websites, is their way to maximise the amount of money, whhich they can drain off you.

Caveat Emptor! (Let the byer beware!)

Moneywise, 'g-queen' cost you more/month, but check what you get...

You decide what is better value for your money!

As yet, TBP has not made a review on 'g-queen', which is to my astonishment... However, they can't be everywhere at the same time...

By now TBP has been notified about the existense of 'g-queen' and hopefully we shall see a review of it within a reasonable time.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (10)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


badandy400 (103) Well, one things worth mention is that the site you recommend is a $50 per month site. That price is absolutely absurd considering the content. $50 for 1.5 MBit video of something that is not truly unique will not sit well with most of us. Many of use have been feeling it when we pay $30 for a site!

I understand the download limit, and split site issues though. Those are two of my largest NO-NOs for websites.

A review of the site would be nice, but TBP may not jump on that simply because the cost makes it a site that the majority is less likely to join and they need to focus on sites that are most likely to help people.

On that note. Why not simply write a review yourself. You already know the ups and downs of both sites so why suggest that someone else spends their time and money when you already have.

10-25-08  08:07pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
You say: "By now TBP has been notified about the existense of 'g-queen' and hopefully we shall see a review of it within a reasonable time. "

I haven't seen any "notification" from you about the site. Only it's mention here. In future, if you want a site listed, please email the URL to "support [at] pornusers [dot] com"

In the meantime, I've passed this one to the TBP Editors.

10-26-08  05:26am

Reply To Message


lurifax (0) REPLY TO #2 - Khan :

An email was sent to the admin. @ TBP before my comments were posted.
10-26-08  11:06am

Reply To Message


lurifax (0) REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :

Firstly I want to apologize for not having noticed before that ‘www2.g-queen.com’ has a daily download limit of 1.5GB (the last item on F.A.Q.), which makes the site less interesting: No information is given about the video clips sizes, which makes one doubt if it is possible to download the lot (presently 121 of them) within a month.

That apart, (I quote “…something that is not truly unique…”) maybe you would be generous enough to let me know where else one may find a plentitude of Shaved Japanese girls?

I have seen enough amateurish drivel (“reviews”) to let myself into that business. It is, in my opinion, better left to the professionals. Besides – they are paid for it.

10-26-08  06:07pm

Reply To Message


badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #4 - lurifax :

If you look at the logo for this site is states "porn reviews by the people." Point being that it is by the people and not by professionals. Of course there will be some lame reviews and some others who take more pride in it and do a much better job.

As for where to find shaved Japanese girls, I really could not say because it is not something I have gone after. The point being that shaved girls is not an unusual niche American, European, Oriental or otherwise. Getting a Japanese shaved girl would be no more difficult to get an American shaved girl and does not warrant such costs.

A recent posting was about Ass Smoothies. That is unique, I have not seen that done in many places. It does not command $50 even though if that is something you truly wanted you would have to pay that.

I honestly do not know how many shaved Japanese sites are out there, but it is certainly more than the amount that feature ass smoothies.

I might suggest looking for this niche from sites that actually are Japanese. It would look a little strange and perhaps be strange to read if translation does not work correctly, but I am sure you can find many sites that way.

I just do not feel that this site has the niche cornered to the point that it can charge whatever it wants.

10-26-08  06:22pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #3 - lurifax :

As an aside ...

The site has now been added. You may enter your remarks at

10-27-08  06:19am

Reply To Message


lurifax (0) REPLY TO #6 - Khan :

Thanks, it is a start...but did you got the price right?
10-27-08  06:42pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #7 - lurifax :

The editors list the price based on what they find when they visit the site. I show they currently list the site as:
Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $54.95 (3 months, non-recurring)

10-28-08  04:39am

Reply To Message


lurifax (0) REPLY TO #8 - Khan :

There has been a mix-up.

The prices given by the editors are the prices for 'lbfm' - not 'g-queen'!

The correct prices are on page http://www2.g-queen.com/eng/join.html

10-28-08  07:53am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #9 - lurifax :

That was my bad ... I grabbed the price from the LBFM listing rather than the one they entered for g-queen.

But, as it happens, there was a typo... $39 recurring at $44 when it should have been $49 recurring at $44

So, while I made the mistake in which prices I posted, your prompt did let us catch the typo. Thanks

I'm told the price is correct now.

10-28-08  08:29am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.