Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (2)
Active
93
The Clyde (26) 09-24-08  02:42pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Love the Shaved Look!!!!!!!
- Love the Body Type, Slender, Natural and Tight
- Love the differing styles with Tats, Piercings and Alternative looks
- Love the American models mixed with the Euros
- Love the Zips Files for Photos
- Love the Extensive Catalog with sets dating back to 2007 and beyond
- Really like that they have remastered some of the popular sets.
Cons: - I would like to see them include ALL of their released photo sets.
- They really need to standardize their website, too many page styles and download options.
- Too many small zip files when they could consolidate the older sets into larger zip files.
- They need to pay another web guy to standardize the older model sets.
Bottom Line: ALS is a great niche site and delivers exactly what they say. It would be great if they spent time on standardizing the older material. I'm a web guy,so this is a bit annoying to me. That being said, the deliver a great product. Score would be 99 if they kept up on the maint. of the site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

 Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

 TheRizzo (23) For pure content and HD videos, this is still one of my favorite sites and at the discounts of $25 a month is a great value.

They would benifit from hiring a designer to update the sites look and navigation though.
 09-26-08  09:31am

Reply To Message

2

 turboshaft (24) This is one of my favorite sites too, navigation aside. Their videos, including older standard definition, still look great, as well as the newer photos.

I do wish they would redesign some things though. Personally, I am not a big fan of everything being included in a single photoset (outtakes, goofs, etc.). I understand that this makes it much easier to download content, but it also just adds a lot of junk to downloads.

For example, their newest photoshoot releases are quite large, but it ends of being a lot of sloooow stripping and unnecessary shots with the male assistants in the frame. I like seeing just the model, not the dudes sweatin' between her legs with the camera and lights.

On the other hand, going through their older material (say pre-2000), and there is not enough content. Most of their earlier models are just as attractive as their current talent, but they have not released many of their photos or videos to prove it.
 09-28-08  10:39am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.