Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Killer Gram

Killer Gram (0)

MargulisAZ (84) 08-25-08  11:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1105 videos to choose from.
All exclusive content and girls.
Daily updates (every update is a full video scene).
Many different fetish categories.
Scenes are typically very good with a lot of energy.
Model search and fetish search option.
Cons: Site navigation need improvment.
No video trailers for individual scenes.
Only 6 small vidcap photos to represent 20+ minutes of video.
Slow download speeds (averaged around 200 kbps).
Have to input password multiple times while browsing.
1 download option for Windows user regarding video size (640 x 360).
Photosets are lacking in quantity (about 50 pics per set) and quality.
VERY expensive (40 bucks a month).
Many unattractive models in model index.
Bottom Line: I was disappointed with this site after seeing the extremely high ratings and positive feedback. It all boils down to this: I don't care how good the actual content of a site is if it's a huge pain in the ass to get to, or you have to guess on what to download and what not to download. Points of interest:

1. Let me explain how my statement applies to this site. First, as I said in my pros, the scenes themselves are very good. The girls are good looking and the energy in some of the scenes is palpable. BUT, figuring out what to download is a complete guessing game. There are no trailers for individual scenes, there are just general trailers for each sub-site within the site. For example, one of the sites within Killergram is "Bitch Funkers". That site itself has close to 50 videos, but there is just 1 trailer that kind of summarizes what Bitch Funkers is all about, not a trailer for each scene. Well, maybe that wouldn't be so bad since a lot of sites don't have trailers for each scene and don't suffer from it. Well, the difference is that most of those sites provide either a good quantity of vidcaps to get a sense of what to expect on a video, or a photoset of vidcaps to browse through. NOT HERE. Here you get 5 tiny photos, and 1 medium sized photo to represent 20+ minutes of video. That's it. The photoset for each scene (small also) is not vidcaps but mostly posing from the models, so that doesn't help you decide whether to download a video either. So, ultimately, it comes down to guessing whether to download a video or not since the photos don't even give you close to an idea of what is all going to be on a video scene, and the download speeds are so slow it hardly makes it worth going through the hassle. VERY FRUSTRATING.

2. The videos only have 1 download option, and that is 640 x 360. This is disappointing also to me. For a site that focuses almost entirely on video, I think there should definitely be better video options to choose from.

3. Site navigation is not horrible but does need improvement. It's nice that there is a model and fetish search option, but looking through scenes based on the sub-site is lacking and needs to be refined.

4. Even though there are a lot of cons, there is an absolute ton of content here and it can't be overlooked. With over a thousand videos to choose from, you're bound to find something you like sooner or later regardless of the hassle involved.

Overall this site was a disappointment to me, but what made it a disappointment could be easily changed to make it a fantastic site. First, each scene MUST have more and bigger vidcaps, or a trailer, to represent the video. Second, download speeds need improvment. Third, video quality options need to be added (more importantly, bigger videos need to be an option). If these things are addressed, the score would easily be in the 90s. As it is, however, an 80 is the best I can give here.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Man, I think Margulis (from the fine state of Arizona) takes the prize concerning a thorough review...
Been a member of Killergram three times and am still both thrilled and frustrated by this site.
The navigation and download-options are a mess - but some of the models and some of the videos are just top (and I do not go for photosets at all, here).
The updates are great - new videos daily.
But two other serious cons I agree with: Slow downloads and a slack of getting new models in the same "good looking" standard as when the site started up.....

08-26-08  01:38pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.