XOXO Leah (0)
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
||-Good-looking web-only US softcore model.
-All-natural, zero tattoos, zero piercings.
-Exclusive content. Model cannot be found anywhere else.
-Some good photos, as long as you are OK with lots of airbrushing.
-I liked the choice of outfits.
-Good interaction with the model.
-Model ends up usually fully nude. Softcore posing.
Current Weekly Update Rate:
-1 photo gallery.
-2 videos from the gallery: 1 BTS, 1 camera tease (10 min each).
-1 short diary entry. Diary entries are dated.
-1 hour webcam chat. Full recorded chat is also released.
||-The site has lots of little navigation annoyances.
-Flashy tour but extremely plain design inside.
-Photography style is always the same.
-Photos are very repetitive: few different poses.
-Videos are too slow paced; this makes them quite boring.
-Model speaks very rarely.
-Model isn't very skilled at posing (she's barely 19, though).
-Bad lighting. Content can be too dark or have strange shadows.
-Weird rebilling options: 1-month is the least expensive per month.
||This site has a great looking all-natural model, a good update schedule and some decent content but also a plethora of little drawbacks that eventually left me with a sense of missed opportunity. Maybe the creators should subscribe to other sites and see how things are done.
I used to think Mac and Bumble (known for airbushing their photos a lot) was the pinnacle of glamour photography so this site's extensive airbrushing isn't a great issue for me. Some of the photos are very worth watching but they are so repetitive that I often came back to photo 4 or 5 before I realised I'd already seen the whole gallery and I'd returned to the start. There's also too much cropping: some limb is often left out of the photo and there are way too much photos of the torso only (boobs and panties, no face). The photos are somewhat small. Ironically, the webmaster started a poll four months ago asking if people would like 1800x1200 photos; everyone answered yes but you still get 1000x670.
Having a 10 minutes behind-the-scenes video and 10 minutes more of camera teasing for each set is a great idea. The trouble is that both videos are extremely slow paced and pretty much indistinguishable except for where the model is looking at: photo camera or video camera. Poses can be sustained for a whole minute except for slight head movements or hair rearrangements, you get long sustained zooms to a body part while the model doesn't move at all, the same music clips over and over in every video even when the model can be seen speaking directly to the camera (no voice can be heard). With a few exceptions, the videos are very unsexy.
Regarding the chats, I haven't attended any (Thursdays, 8PM CST) but I've browsed several of the recorded ones. It's nice to have 1 hour long weekly chats and also have the full recording released a couple of weeks later. Looks like she often wears some costume (nurse, maid, etc) which she gradually takes off. The trouble is that she doesn't speak at all despite the feed has audio. Watching an hour long of video of a hot girl typing and, occasionally standing up to do some striptease isn't worth it. It's probably different if you catch it live but the no-talk is a clear minus anyway. Is her voice so unsexy? Some editing and some more talking would be welcome for the recorded ones.
She's very active in the forum (2-3 posts per day) and is also reachable by email or PM in the forum. Together with the chats and the (somewhat short and generic) weekly diary entries makes for very good interaction. The webmaster is also reachable in the forum and complaints are listened to.
Reply To Review