Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day (0)

MargulisAZ (84) 07-31-08  02:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (1)

No new material anymore, only remastered updates.

** comment updated as of 8/25/08 **

The site has stopped shooting new models and releasing new material. All updates are now old material that is "remastered". Please be aware of this when joining.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (19)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Agree....
Just ended this term and had that feeling "sneaky".

Been member on and off have quite some years now - and recognize more and more older stuff - It's okay with some remastered stuff with a little better looking videos.
But they overdoing this old stuff - and yes: without clear info.

07-31-08  03:33am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) This hasn't been lost on me, either. If you look carefully at the little kind of white oval shaped thing on the thumb, it does say "Reloaded" but it isn't nearly as noticeable as the former "Once upon a time, on (insert date here) ..." they were putting on them.

Thing is, there are members from way back in 2002. We've seen every single update since then. And some of us are members of PU. And we know which porn stars are current and which aren't, so put it all together and those who get "reloaded" aren't usually hard to spot.

I look forward to seeing Sandra (blue couch) again tomorrow morning. That one's not even labelled "reloaded" but I think it is. Why? I have photos of the same scene, and when I moused over one, it said it was taken in 2002. Also, the older photos were taken before she got that (completely unneeded) boob job.

I enjoy and appreciate the reloaded stuff because it looks better than the original (usually) and the pic sizes are sometimes MUCH bigger than they were before.

But what I don't like is this shift to labelling content as if it's "new" when it's not. Once someone starts trying to pull it over on you, you never know what they'll do next.

And I wonder what's happened to DDF. We haven't heard from Bela in a while (the webmaster). I get a feeling that something's changed. Are they still hiring new girls? I've been wondering about that, too.

07-31-08  04:05am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Thanks to Drooler - AGAIN - for stating things af they are...(and of course to MargulisAZ for bringing this up about 1 By Day).

Damn, Drooler and quite a few other PUs - I envy you - because it's a problem for this user: the native language compared to english - like some scandinavian writer just said:
"All the fine language details is lost when you have to speculate about translation" (something like that, anyway).
Well, ok, that's the deal here at this site - so bottom line: I keep working on it..
And yes, I've had the same speculations as Drooler - about 1 By Day:

Has something changed radically - It would be a shame for this once great site - and for us. And foremost: Where are the new girls? The NEW girls/the NEW stuff that is so importend for most serious PUs
1 By Day used to be among the best in that field...

07-31-08  07:08am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :


BTW Drooler:

You may have seen this - it sure looks good (video-wise) and/but a french site:


She's done a bit at Explicite Art

07-31-08  07:16am

Reply To Message


Wittyguy (105) I recently finished a membership at Handsonhardcore and noticed that there was a lot of "remastering" going on there as well. I think it's due in part to the fact that most porn surfers haven't been around all that long and will think it's new and in part saving production money while keeping the updates flowing.
07-31-08  11:44am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

Wow, that Max 3 video cover is something else with the guy sitting under the "vaginal archway," as it were. Megane looks pretty hot, too.
07-31-08  01:00pm

Reply To Message


MargulisAZ (84) REPLY TO #5 - Wittyguy :

I would imagine this is probably the main reason sites are doing this, to save money. It makes you look good that you update so much, even though there really isn't much more new content updated than any other site. I don't like it because I've already seen it all and like new material and new girls, but people new to the site or to online porn probably could care less, and don't even know. So unfortunately, it seems to be happening more and more on different site.
07-31-08  01:45pm

Reply To Message


MargulisAZ (84) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Taking a closer look at the updates recently, it actually looks like ALL OF IT is remastered old material. Yikes, that's really scary if one of the best sites is now no longer updating any new material and models at all. Even the ones that do not say reloaded are old from what I can see.
07-31-08  07:34pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #8 - MargulisAZ :

's right!! I just looked at the Sandra Kalerman "Blue Couch" set (with color uncoordinated green toy) and sure enough, deja vu all over again!
08-01-08  01:18am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

Hey, Denner, I know you've been frustrated in the hunt for new stuff.

Well, I just found a new site that looks interesting: walterbosque-art (add the w's and the .com).

It's a pretty large collection, exclusive stuff, Latina, pics to 5000px, some nice looking babes.

$24.95 ("recurring," but that's no matter if you stay for only a month). Billing by CCBill.

08-01-08  03:12am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #10 - Drooler :

Thanks for that tip, Drooler.
Judging by their looks the site seems to have some new models - faces/bodies I don't recall having seen before, anyway.
And names - we can never depend on....

08-01-08  03:39am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #11 - Denner :

Hey Denner,
More news, good and bad, since I joined (impulsive me):

No zips!
No vids!

Nice quality pics!
Lots of ASS pics (good for me!)

I was just going through the "telephone" gallery of their "Lola." My God! I had to pick myself back up off the floor!

08-01-08  03:47am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #12 - Drooler :

Yes, sir - judging from the cover-photo Lola is a smashing brunette!!
BTW: Brunettes - have you seen Sandra Shine has turned blond?
Just found a DDF Prod. -clip, don't know from which site, though.
A bit of a shame: she looks older and less elegant/classy...

08-01-08  04:11am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #13 - Denner :

Smashing, indeed! I've been not only smitten, but smashed!

Yes, I've also seen Sandra Shine as a blond recently. There's something about these Hungarian girls wanting to change their hair color. Britney (aka Brigitte Hunter) and Bambi switched to brunette (very black, actually, like they couldn't stop until they were absolutely black). And the Czech Veronica DaSouza recently went blond and bigger in the boobies (another completely unnecessary "enhancement").

08-01-08  04:33am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #14 - Drooler :

Blond Sandra Shine....Of course - what a lack of memory for my part: Her own site - well, you can't win them all...
08-02-08  02:39pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) Another thing thing they do is sit on their butts with the Sunday "casting" updates. It's happened again and again, and it happened this morning, too. (They "post" new updates 4 a.m. my time.)

But, as usual, they hadn't put up the thumbs and the zips don't work, either! (Error msg) I checked at 5:30 a.m. They cheerfully suggest that I check back later. Hmmph.

"Yo, if you're going to post something as updated, make sure it is!"

P-R-O-F-E-S-S-I-O-N-A-L-I-S-M (Thought I'd just spell it out for 'em.)

08-03-08  02:56am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) And another thing: They can't even keep the names straight. They have an upcoming hardcore set with Julie Silver but they've got her named Sandra de Marco! (It's another redux, btw. Just thought I'd mention it.)
08-15-08  04:04am

Reply To Message


MargulisAZ (84) REPLY TO #17 - Drooler :

Yeah this sucks, this site used to be awesome and now I probably won't even join again. No reason to since there aren't any more new girls or shoots. How lame.
08-15-08  09:37am

Reply To Message


sparks (0) I totally agree. They used to have lots of new great sets but sadly now most are recycled. I wouldn't mind so much but I feel the recent sets are much better in many ways.

For those of you who have their sets take a look at the "Date Picture Taken" property in Explore. I was looking at the last few months and it seemed that around 90% were recycled from as far back as 7 years ago (sets which I already had).

11-10-08  08:23am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.