Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (2)

MargulisAZ (84) 07-31-08  01:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)

Things need improvement.

I've been hanging around Alsscan for years now and I'm seeing problems. I wish I could do my review over actually. Still a good site but needs some change. Problems I see:

1. Content is getting less extreme. New models are rarely fisting anymore or doing as extreme of shoots as used to be the norm. Disappointing to say the least for fans like me who joined the site years ago because of such consistent content such as that.

2. The reality is that new true updates are not frequent. Now I know that sounds crazy since there is a new video and pic set added daily, but hear me out. How often is a new girl added to the site? Maybe once every 1-2 weeks. Ok, but then the model's material is usually broken down into at least 5 photo sets and 5 video sets, each of which are released at totally different times. And those updates in and of themselves are completely random, so there is really no telling when you may see the scene you want to see. Throw in the multiple updates of older stuff re released, and the real updates are indeed infrequent.

3. To my 3rd complaint: the release of material is completely disorganized and chaotic. There are still pic sets and videos of girls not released from over a year ago. This is especially frustrating when you really like a model and want to see all her stuff. I strongly suggest some sort of new release program that gets a model's content out at once, or at least over the course of a few weeks.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Sarah (13)
Webmaster
Thank you for your comments, but I have to say that virtually
all of the emails we have been receiving lately tell us how much we have improved during the past year (New updates 7 days a week, complete photosets, HD Videos, Public Beach Sex, Members voting systems, Directors Blog, and so much more). So please let me address your comments individually.

1. We get about an equal amount of emails that say our content is
too extreme and ones that say we are not extreme enough. Given
that, we feel we are right where we should be. Are we getting any
less extreme than we were 10 years ago? No Way. Some of our
best fisting photos and videos ever shot have been within the past 2
years. If a new model cannot handle fisting because her pussy is
too tight, or does not enjoy it, then we do not make her do it. I
believe you may be referring to Franziska who we just shot:
http://www.alsscan.com/bios/modelfranziska.html
She is 18 and her pussy was so tight we did not even try
to fist her - it would be pointless. But then if a girl comes in like
Tristan Kingsley who loves to fist, and whom we also just shot,
we will shoot 3 or 4 sets and videos of her doing just that:
http://www.alsscan.com/bios/modeltristankingsley.html

2) We add more new updates than 95% of the web sites out there.
We release a new update every single day - 7 days a week. This
is new content and the updates are not small. Either a full
complete NEW photoset is added (usually between 200-300 hi-res
3000+ pixel photos) or a full length NEW video scene usually 15-30
minutes in length. Not to mention we also release huge photo and
video bonuses and some of the best public nudity and public sex
videos that have ever been produced - no site has ever come close
to matching some of the stuff we shot on the public beaches in the
tropics. We release models and sets based on members
requests. If we shot a model 3 years ago and she is never
requested then we simply do not release her. The owner has a

07-31-08  06:59am

Reply To Message

2

Sarah (13)
Webmaster
Ooops, I got cut off.....

The owner has a blog and solicits model and scene requests from members on a regular basis. New models are added approximately every 2 weeks but this is because we simply do not just shoot any model
that is willing to spread her legs. We travel the world looking for
only the highest quality models. In addition to all of our NEW daily
updates, we also release remastered sets and videos of our older
material. We are bringing our entire photo and video archive up to
the quality standards that are expected today (and you hold that
against us?).

3) As for your comment about sets being released randomly, we
have just added a members realtime voting system for each new
models scene. This will determine the exact release order of
each models scene and allow all members to participate online.
Again we direct you to the Members Blog for all of the latest
improvements and developments coming to ALS Scan.

07-31-08  07:00am

Reply To Message

3

MargulisAZ (84) REPLY TO #1 - Sarah :

I'm sorry but my opinions stand. I understand you need to defend your site, but I disagree with you.

1. There have always been some models who fist and who do not, but lately the ratio is more to who do not than who does. I believe I remember a blog where Alex said that he used to make it a point to NOT shoot girls that couldn't do most of the extreme stuff, so I'm assuming he lowered his standards on that. You can quote what's happened over the last 2 years, I'm talking about over the last few months, and that's what matters to me. I'm not saying there is no hard content anymore, or that there is no fisting, I'm just saying there is less than there used to be and I don't like the trend. Your latest model updates: Franziska, Sabrina Sweet, Cherry Potter, Megan Malone, Molly shoot 2, upcoming Mia Ross. One of them, Molly, has a fisting set. That's what I'm talking about.

2. Voting system or no voting system, the problem stills stands that a model's content is released randomly and over a very long period of time. It's frustrating and disorganized as far as I'm concerned. And at least 3 of the videos released weekly are old videos remastered so it can take forever to see all of a model's content. And again, there are multiple models who date back to over 6 months ago that have not had all their content released.

There have been good things, such as the full photo set releases, no content rotation, high def videos, etc. I agree with you on that. That does not, however, have anything to do with these problems I talk about, or take away from them.

07-31-08  02:02pm

Reply To Message

4

turboshaft (24) I am huge fan of Alsscan too but I am afraid you are probably right on some of these points.

1. It does seem slightly less extreme lately, but it's hard to tell if it really turns out to be softer content in the long run. Franziska is a good example; yes, she is really hot, and Alex says she is really popular but I have just not been interested, regardless of the braces or tan lines or whatever people thought was interesting. No fisting, not even a speculum scene (at least that I am aware of) -- pointless indeed.

I think it may be an excess of the fluff content rather than a lack of hardcore content thatís the problem. By this I mean all the cars, candy, and glamour shots they have started adding. If I wanted to see cars I would look on a car site, and the lollipops seem to be what everyone else is doing as well so it gets boring fast. The softer or glamour shots can be a little much sometimes and I think this was mentioned in relation to ALS Angels and in response they were adding some more establishing shots before a model goes straight for the toy or insertion. This is fine but it quickly adds a lot of boring repetitive stuff, especially now that they release a whole scene at once, including all bloopers and outtakes.

2. I disagree here, to me they release new models (or rerelease archived material) frequently enough, especially considering how big a release usually is, but...

3. ...I do wish they would release the majority of a model's shoot within 6 to 9 months. I hate it when there are random releases from a model they shot more than a year ago, then only to say "well, she wasn't very popular so we didn't release any of her stuff." I understand it can be hard to agree on whom, or what scene, is really the most popular -- even with a voting system -- but it is frustrating to see something on a promo page but nowhere else simply because a model is "unpopular."

This is still a great site and I think it can remain that way with a few tweaks to the formula.

08-03-08  09:21pm

Reply To Message

5

MargulisAZ (84) REPLY TO #4 - turboshaft :

Yeah, that's one of the things I mentioned and wanted people to keep in mind with my comment and updated review. While I am talking about things that I believe could use with a change, it is still a good site. It could be even better in my opinion, but it is in no way bad.

Franziska is a good example, and I agree with what you have to say. And it wouldn't be a big deal to me if she was an anomaly. The scary thing to me is that she is one of 5 out of the last 6 "new girl updates" that are similar in the "not extreme" nature. One here and there and I'm not going to complain, but this is a lot, especially when a "new girl update" only comes once every two weeks, and even then you never know when you'll see a specific set.

Enough about my bitching about the release format, onto solutions. I believe that the way to handle the situation is to completely scrap the current system and move onto something more organized and reasonable. So a new model is added every two weeks right? Well then I propose her content to be COMPLETELY released within 2 weeks to a month. That is still longer than some other sites who fully release all girl's content the second they come on (FTV for example), but it's much better than what it is now. You can still have remastered material take up half of the updates, so that leaves the need for about 15 new vid and pic sets per month. As it is 2 new girl's content (the amount of girl's released per month) wouldn't quite fill that quota, but it would be close. With the remaining updates to fill the month they could continue to release unreleased material from past girls, or maybe even say take a Sunday off of updates. Maybe update Monday-Saturday, or at worst Monday-Friday. That would fill the update requirements, get a model's content out in a reasonable and dependable amount of time, and still leave room for all the remastered material. Voila, problem solved. :)

08-03-08  11:53pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.